Abstract:The subject of research in the field of work is legal communication in the administrative procedure with the focus of communication in the process of hearing. Communication in the administrative procedure in this paper means the pre-planned, official process of information transfer in voice and writing between legal entities in a legal relationship, in accordance with the needs of the administrative procedure. The paper emphasizes the specificity of the hearing in the administrative procedure in relation to other legal proceedings (criminal and civil proceedings), which is reflected in the fact that one party in a legal relation is always the holder of state authority, that is, state administration bodies, other state bodies and organizations with public authorizations, and other non-state entities such as the territorial and local self-government bodies, while the other party consists of natural and legal persons, i.e. individuals, enterprises, institutions, and certain collectives such as settlements, groups of persons, etc. The basic conclusion from the results of the research in this paper is that the hearing of a party in the administrative procedure (dispute) does not have the same procedural importance as in the criminal or civil proceedings. The main reason for such a conclusion is that the administrative procedure is not a dispute between the two opposing parties, but the procedure in which the administrative body and the party take part, and therefore, in accordance with the legal nature and character of the administrative procedure, only the legal principle should listen to the other side. Starting from this key conclusion, the work under the hearing of a party in administrative proceedings is understood to provide an opportunity for a party to make a statement on the issues related to it. A party may use that right, but it does not have to. Precisely, these specificities of legal communication in the administrative procedure are the main subject of research in this paper.

Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Legislative Hearing

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

Restatement on the Legislative Purpose of Administrative Reconsideration

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

The Democratic Limitation and Procedural Justice of Public Hearing

Administrative Power under Human Dignity

The Possibility of Reconciliation in Administrative Procedure in Legal Criterion——A Perspective of Legal Interpretation

On the Judgement of Public Interests of Administrative Requisition

The Hearing Procedure in British Administrative Law

Sound Governance in Administrative Legislation

Problems in the Legislation of the AdministrativeProcedure in China

A Study on the Administrative Public Interest Litigation System

Public Policy-Making Hearing:Value and Limitation of Administrative Democracy

Study on utterances of administrative law enforcement in van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis

On Form Natural Justice to Due Process——The Transplantation of Legal Thoughts on the Legistation of Administrative

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

A Developmental Research on Modern Administrative Activity Mode

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

Research on Judicial Review of Manifestly Improper Administrative Acts

Legal communication in administrative proceeding