Abstract:The concept of due process, inspired by Anglo-American law, has become well knew to the Chinese legal circles and been adopted in a number of legislations. However, when laws,regulations, and rules do not provide clear process requirements for administrative organs, it is still uncertain whether the judiciary can apply the due process principle in reviewing the legality of administrative acts or not, given that the Administrative Litigation Law 1989 stipulates that an administrative act in violation of statutory process should be void. By statistically analyzing the legal basis invoked in the administrative rulings in law reports and analyzing more than ten representative cases concerning administrative process, as well as the interviews with judges, this article reviews the development of the due process principle in judicial practice of China. Over a period of more than ten years, judicial awareness and confidence of the due process principle has been strengthened, and the legitimacy of judges' application of this principle has been enhanced as well. The "violation of statutory process" provision, which has become a crucial basis for judicial review of administrative acts, provides a channel for the due process principle to be introduced into judicial practice. Judges' conception of due process has also been jointly shaped by various extra-statutory factors, such as scholars' introduction and advocacy, standard legislations, judicial precedents and the government's emphasis on law- based administration. Through the ripple effects of innovative rulings on similar cases, the judicial application of due process principle has been widely acknowledged and the principle begins to be incorporated into law. This fact suggests that, even despite its limited power, Chinese judiciary has demonstrated its activist stance and potential in upholding justice and developing law. However, due to the lack of judicial authority and respect for judicial precedents, judiciary innovations in individual cases cannot yet yield a predictable, nationwide impact. The dawn of the due process principle has come, but there will be a significant period of time before the principle reaches full ascendancy.

The Hearing Procedure in British Administrative Law

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Legislative Hearing

Administrative Power under Human Dignity

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

On the Judgement of Public Interests of Administrative Requisition

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

A Tentative Exploration into the Feasibility of Administration of Justice's Interference with Domestic Violence

The Possibility of Reconciliation in Administrative Procedure in Legal Criterion——A Perspective of Legal Interpretation

The Democratic Limitation and Procedural Justice of Public Hearing

On Form Natural Justice to Due Process——The Transplantation of Legal Thoughts on the Legistation of Administrative

On the Abiding Force of Administrative Action on Civil Adjudication

Some Indications of Due Process Principle in Judicial Judgments of China

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action

Legal communication in administrative proceeding

Public Policy-Making Hearing:Value and Limitation of Administrative Democracy

Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

The Analysis Of Administrative Litigation Procedure