Abstract:The exercising rule and supervision of administrative discretion power has long been the focal point in the research field of administrative law. Authority scope of administrative discretion and the shift of its guiding and controlling route obviously indicate the different tasks of administrative power and the change of relevant fundamental theories of administrative law and constitutional theories. The analysis shows the dividing line between the indefinite concept and the administrative discretion, coming of the judgment on whether the indefinite concept is question of fact or law in theory. The bipartite structure comprising the centre of the concept of law and the borderline of the concept of law, makes the concept of law indefinite. The indefinite space, large or small, on the borderline of the concept of law or even on the centre of the concept of law, results in the common character of the indefinite concept of law-polysemy, which indicates the applying of the indefinite concept of law certainly includes the course of choosing the most appropriate meaning to the specific case. The inherent factual intension of the indefinite concept of law denials the assumption that its applying is a pure legal problem. By sorting out the doctrines and practice of state administrative discretion in major countries under the rule of law such as Germany, we can find that the connotation and denotation of administrative discretion depends on the current situation and development trend of administrative tasks. In view of this, the paper defines China’s administrative discretion on the basis of major administrative tasks at present, and puts forward a definition of administrative discretion in a broad sense, including essential condition discretion and effect discretion. The innovativeness of this idea is that it uncovers the inherent relation between the definition of administrative discretion and the orientation of administrative power, thus bringing about the factual background of regulation environment and structure with regard to the characteristic of individual cases in administrative discretion.

Re- cognizing the Functional Concept of an Access to Administrative Litigation

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Restatement on the Legislative Purpose of Administrative Reconsideration

The Possibility of Reconciliation in Administrative Procedure in Legal Criterion——A Perspective of Legal Interpretation

On Examining Legality of Regulatory Documents in Administrative Litigation

Rethinking and Reconstruction of the Connection Mechanism between Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Litigation

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

Analysis of Impact from Administrative Reconsideration on Administrative Litigation

Examination of Several Controversial Issues in the Administrative Litigation Law (Draft)

On Amendment of China’s Administrative Reconsideration Law

On the Reconsiderability of Administrative Guidance

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

On Enlargement of the Scope of Accepting Cases in Administrative Actions

The Indefinite Concept of Law Inferred from Administrative Tasks

The Analysis Of Administrative Litigation Procedure