Abstract:According to the theoretical and empirical research,the board of directors is one of the most important mechanisms that control and supervise the managerial opportunism behavior,and the effective board monitoring can help to restrain the financially fraudulent behavior.However,the effectiveness of corporate governance,especially board monitoring,attracted the attention of government and academic scholars in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom.From the perspective of the high quality of external auditing demand,this paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on the effectiveness of board governance.We empirically examines the impacts of board gender diversity and managerial power on the demand for external audit,using the data from the Chinese listed companies during the periods 2002-2006.We use audit fee,Big Ten and Big Four as measures for higher quality of audit demand,and board with at least one female director and proportion of female directors on the boardroom as measures for board gender diversity.After controlling for other known board,firm and industry characteristics,we find that board gender diversity is associated with higher demand for external audit,this indicates that gender diversity in board of directors can help to improve the quality of external audit;however,the positive effect of board gender diversity on demand for external audit exists only when managerial power is lower.These results indicate that it is difficult for female directors to monitor the managers when managerial power is high due to the low degree of board gender diversity in Chinese listed companies.Our paper contributes to the growing literature that provides evidence on the linkage between board monitoring mechanisms and financial reporting and audit processes.More specifically,it extends the literature on the relationship between board characteristics and audit process.Further,this paper adds to the audit quality literature by showing that managerial power is of significant effect on the relationship between board characteristics and audit quality.

Audit Committee Characteristics and the Safeguarding of Auditor Independence

Does Audit Committee Accounting Expertise Help to Promote Audit Quality? Evidence from Auditor Reporting of Internal Control Weaknesses

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses

CEO Power, Internal Control Quality, and Audit Committee Effectiveness in Substance Versus in Form

Audit Committee Governance and Audit Opinion

Audit Committee Quality and Internal Control: An Empirical Analysis

On the Effort-Saving Effect of Audit Committee–auditor Interlocking

The Impact of Audit Committee Financial Expertise on Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) Tone

The Impact of Audit Committee Information Technology Expertise on the Reliability and Timeliness of Financial Reporting

Audit Committee Governance, Motivation of Avoiding Loss and Audit Opinion Shopping

Audit committee accounting financial expertise and stock price crash risk

Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements

The Impact of Audit Committee Strength on the Influence of Management Team Likeability

Audit committee characteristics and financial statement comparability

The association between audit committee effectiveness and audit risk

Audit Committee Mechanisms and the Improvement of Earnings Quality

The Audit Committee's IT Expertise and Its Impact on the Disclosure of Cybersecurity Risk

Does experience matter? An examination of individual Auditor's experience on executive implicit corruption

Former Audit Partners on the Audit Committee and Internal Control Deficiencies

The Disciplining Effect of the Internal Control Provisions of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act on the Governance Structures of Firms