Abstract:In this study, we examine whether audit committee accounting expertise helps to promote audit quality by motivating auditors to conduct diligent internal control audits and make appropriate internal control assessments because audit committee accounting expertise safeguards auditors from dismissal following adverse internal control opinions. Among clients with <i>existing</i> and <i>likely</i> internal control material weaknesses (as proxied by future restatements of audited financial statements), we find a greater likelihood of adverse internal control audit opinions when the audit committee has greater accounting expertise (measured by the proportion of accounting experts on the audit committee). Among all clients, we find a lower likelihood of subsequent auditor dismissal following an adverse internal control audit opinion when the audit committee has greater accounting expertise. In further analyses, we find that this lower likelihood of subsequent auditor dismissal occurs when at least two audit committee members possess accounting expertise. We also find some evidence that chief financial officer influence (but not chief executive officer influence) over the audit committee negates the increased likelihood of adverse internal control opinions when internal control material weaknesses likely exist as well as the decreased likelihood of auditor dismissal following adverse internal control opinions. These findings have important implications for regulators and corporate nominating committees interested in promoting audit committee effectiveness.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Former Audit Partners on the Audit Committee and Internal Control Deficiencies

Spillover Effects of Internal Control Weakness Disclosures: the Role of Audit Committees and Board Connections

Individual Investors' Perceptions of Risk Associated with Internal Control Deficiency Information Disclosure:An Experimental Study

Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses

The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits

Audit Committee Quality and Internal Control: An Empirical Analysis

Do SOX 404 Control Audits and Management Assessments Improve Overall Internal Control System Quality

The Influence of Auditor and Client Section 404 Processes on Remediation of Internal Control Deficiencies at All Levels of Severity

Detection and Severity Classifications of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 Internal Control Deficiencies

The effect of internal control deficiencies on the usefulness of earnings in executive compensation

Internal control deficiencies and the issuance of going concern opinions

Internal Control Deficiencies in Tax Reporting: A Detailed View

The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity

Internal Control Weaknesses and Information Uncertainty

Auditor realignment, voluntary SOX 404 adoption, and internal control material weakness remediation: Further evidence from U.S.-listed foreign firms

The Disciplining Effect of the Internal Control Provisions of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act on the Governance Structures of Firms

Does Audit Committee Accounting Expertise Help to Promote Audit Quality? Evidence from Auditor Reporting of Internal Control Weaknesses

Former Audit Partners and Abnormal Accruals

Audit Committees and Internal Control Quality: Evidence from Nonprofit Hospitals Subject to the Single Audit Act