Abstract:Public disclosure about effectiveness of internal control systems is subject to much controversy in Canada, resulting in Canadian disclosures being made in Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). These disclosures are provided to investors without a definition of the weaknesses to be reported, without implementation effectiveness testing, no direct management certification and no external audit of such disclosures. Though the cost of such SOX North disclosures are lower than in the U.S. setting, the credibility of these disclosures is far from assured, posing an important empirical issue for regulators interested in the cost versus benefit trade-off of various disclosure regimes. We use OLS regression and path analysis embedded in a structural model to examine the association between the strength of internal control and accrual quality in order to infer whether these disclosures are credible. The OLS regression finding of an overall negative net effect of internal control weaknesses on accrual quality is refined by recursive path analysis which shows that this overall negative effect is composed of a large negative direct effect of weaknesses on accrual quality and a smaller offsetting positive indirect effect of weaknesses on accrual quality via increased audit effort. The modest substitution effect implies that auditors cannot fully compensate for poor internal control by increased substantive work, which is per se evidence justifying some form of internal control disclosures for investors. Overall, our results suggest that lower cost SOX North disclosures are credible. This informs the cost-benefit debate facing regulators around the globe seeking alternatives to the costly U.S. model of internal control reporting. JEL Classifications: G38, M41, M42

Auditor realignment, voluntary SOX 404 adoption, and internal control material weakness remediation: Further evidence from U.S.-listed foreign firms

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Expanded Auditor’s Reports and Voluntary Disclosure

The Influence of Auditor and Client Section 404 Processes on Remediation of Internal Control Deficiencies at All Levels of Severity

The Impact of Culture on Internal Control Weaknesses: Evidence from Firms That Cross-List in the U.S.

The effect of internal control deficiencies on the usefulness of earnings in executive compensation

The Disciplining Effect of the Internal Control Provisions of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act on the Governance Structures of Firms

Voluntary Disclosure of Internal Control and Auditor’s Attestation: Evidence from China

Auditor Competencies, Organizational Learning, and Audit Quality: Spillover Effects of Auditing Cross-Listed Clients

Internal Control Deficiency Disclosures among Chinese Reverse Merger Firms

Determinants and economic consequences of voluntary disclosure of internal control weaknesses in China

Direct and Indirect Effects of Internal Control Weaknesses on Accrual Quality: Evidence from A Unique Canadian Regulatory Setting

The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity

Buy, Lie, or Die: an Investigation of Chinese ST Firms’ Voluntary Interim Audit Motive and Auditor Independence

Do SOX 404 Control Audits and Management Assessments Improve Overall Internal Control System Quality

Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China

The Wealth Change and Redistribution Effects of Sarbanes-Oxley Internal Control Disclosures

The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Remediation on Accrual Quality

Local Institutions, Audit Quality, and Corporate Scandals of US-Listed Foreign Firms