Abstract:According to the theoretical and empirical research,the board of directors is one of the most important mechanisms that control and supervise the managerial opportunism behavior,and the effective board monitoring can help to restrain the financially fraudulent behavior.However,the effectiveness of corporate governance,especially board monitoring,attracted the attention of government and academic scholars in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom.From the perspective of the high quality of external auditing demand,this paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on the effectiveness of board governance.We empirically examines the impacts of board gender diversity and managerial power on the demand for external audit,using the data from the Chinese listed companies during the periods 2002-2006.We use audit fee,Big Ten and Big Four as measures for higher quality of audit demand,and board with at least one female director and proportion of female directors on the boardroom as measures for board gender diversity.After controlling for other known board,firm and industry characteristics,we find that board gender diversity is associated with higher demand for external audit,this indicates that gender diversity in board of directors can help to improve the quality of external audit;however,the positive effect of board gender diversity on demand for external audit exists only when managerial power is lower.These results indicate that it is difficult for female directors to monitor the managers when managerial power is high due to the low degree of board gender diversity in Chinese listed companies.Our paper contributes to the growing literature that provides evidence on the linkage between board monitoring mechanisms and financial reporting and audit processes.More specifically,it extends the literature on the relationship between board characteristics and audit process.Further,this paper adds to the audit quality literature by showing that managerial power is of significant effect on the relationship between board characteristics and audit quality.

Audit Committee Governance, Motivation of Avoiding Loss and Audit Opinion Shopping

Audit Committee Governance and Audit Opinion

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

Audit fees, motivation of avoiding loss and opinion shopping

Audit Fees, Motivation Of Avoiding Loss And Opinion Shopping Test For Moderating Effect Based On Evidences Of Chinese Stock Market From 2001 To 2008

On the Abnormal Audit Fees, Audit Committee and Audit Opinion Shopping

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Unfavorable audit opinion,audit fees and opinion shopping

Empirical Research on the Influence of the Effectiveness of Audit Committee to Audit Opinions

Why Couldn't Independent Auditing Exert the Corporate Governance Function: A Case Study on Sheng Run Gu Fen's Receiving Modified Opinions in Fifteen Consecutive Years

Corporate Violations and Audit Opinions: Warning Effect or Uncovering Effect?

Audit Fees, Auditor Switching and Audit Opinion Shopping:Test for Interaction Effect Based on Evidences of Chinese Stock Market

Goodwill impairment, auditor dismissal and opinion shopping–evidence from China

Audit Committee Mechanisms and the Improvement of Earnings Quality

Abnormal Audit Fees and the Shredded Audit Quality:Evidence from China's Public Companies

Who Prefer to Set Audit Committee?——Research on Motivation for Setting Audit Committee

Empirical Analysis on Audit Opinion Modification by Explanatory Paragraph

Audit Opinion Improvement and the Timing of Disclosure

Does Audit Committee Accounting Expertise Help to Promote Audit Quality? Evidence from Auditor Reporting of Internal Control Weaknesses

The Audit Opinions for Financial Sensitive Zones and Items of China's Listed Companies

International expansion and audit opinion shopping: A signaling perspective