Abstract:Companies facing serious financial distress are more likely to engage in income-increasing earnings management than healthy firms in order to mask poor performance. In these contexts, audit firms might increase substantive tests, that should constrain discretionary accruals, as well as charging risk premiums, both resulting in growing audit fees. The different components of audit fees, namely a fee premium for auditors’ efforts or risk premium, however, have an opposing impact on audit quality. This paper aims thus to investigate how the business context status of a client might differently affect the auditors’ pricing policies and commitments in the audit process. We address our research questions adopting a matched sample consisting of bankrupt and healthy US firms in the post-SOX period, between 2005 and 2015. Consistent with our predictions, the results show a significant propensity of ex-post bankrupt firms to adopt upward earnings management. In these critical contexts, it reveals that auditors are primarily concerned about obtaining a risk premium, especially in the first year of an engagement, rather than extending the audit efforts to constrain earnings manipulation. By contrast, the higher audit fees charged to healthy companies by the newly appointed auditors result in effective audit efforts, therefore improving the earnings quality. This study thus provides evidence that in riskier business contexts auditors prefer conservative approaches to pro-active commitments by primarily adjusting risk premiums in response to a higher litigation risk. The paper contributes to the extant literature by documenting the existence of a component in the audit fees that results in low audit quality.

Unfavorable audit opinion,audit fees and opinion shopping

Audit fees, motivation of avoiding loss and opinion shopping

On the Abnormal Audit Fees, Audit Committee and Audit Opinion Shopping

Audit Fees, Motivation Of Avoiding Loss And Opinion Shopping Test For Moderating Effect Based On Evidences Of Chinese Stock Market From 2001 To 2008

Abnormal Audit Fees and the Shredded Audit Quality:Evidence from China's Public Companies

Audit Fees, Auditor Switching and Audit Opinion Shopping:Test for Interaction Effect Based on Evidences of Chinese Stock Market

Audit Committee Governance, Motivation of Avoiding Loss and Audit Opinion Shopping

Audit Committee Governance and Audit Opinion

Abnormal Audit Fees, Audit Market Concentration and Audit Quality

Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch

Related Transactions, Executive's Salary Gap and Audit Fees

Managerial myopia and audit fees: Evidence from China

Internal Control Opinion Shopping: Does Initial Audit Fee Discounting Matter?

The Audit Opinions for Financial Sensitive Zones and Items of China's Listed Companies

Do Auditors Shift the Weight on Performance Indicators to More Favorable Measures?

Annual report inquiry letters, disclosure of key audit matters and audit fees: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies

Related-party Transaction,Audit Opinion and Regulation

Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality, The Impact of Business Context on Auditors' Priorities

Empirical Analysis on Audit Opinion Modification by Explanatory Paragraph

Goodwill impairment, auditor dismissal and opinion shopping–evidence from China

Auditor Switch in a Corporation Group and Opinion Shopping