Abstract:Research background: Issuing an annual report inquiry letter is a powerful means by which securities exchanges regulate the information of listed companies, which can convey information, reveal risks, and sustain the orderly development of capital markets. However, research on the economic consequences is limited. Purpose of the article: This study analyses the relationships and mechanisms between annual report inquiry letters, key audit matters (KAMs), and audit fees. Methods: We collected data from Chinese A-share companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges between 2017 and 2022, totalling 9,903 observations. We used Stata to conduct mediation effects and heterogeneity tests on the data. We also conducted further research on the relationship between audit fees and the purchase of audit opinions. Findings & value added: The results indicate that (1) companies that receive annual report inquiry letters have higher audit fees. Furthermore, (2) companies that receive annual report inquiry letters are more likely to increase the number of disclosed KAMs, leading to higher audit fees. Finally, (3) the above relationship is more significant amongst companies audited by non-Big-Four accounting firms than amongst those audited by Big-Four accounting firms. Further, the increase in audit fees for the sample companies is not due to the purchase of audit opinions and is combined with robustness tests, further validating the conclusions of this study. These findings contribute to research on the economic impact of implementing the annual report inquiry system and new auditing standards, providing empirical evidence for the effectiveness of government oversight of capital markets.

The Audit Opinions for Financial Sensitive Zones and Items of China's Listed Companies

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

A Re-examination of the Auditor Independence in China

Abnormal Audit Fees and the Shredded Audit Quality:Evidence from China's Public Companies

Empirical Analysis on Audit Opinion Modification by Explanatory Paragraph

Corporate Violations and Audit Opinions: Warning Effect or Uncovering Effect?

Related-party Transaction,Audit Opinion and Regulation

Analyses on Modified Audit Opinions and Industry Difference of Listed Companies' Annual Reports--Empirical Research Based on Industry Samples from 2000 to 2003

The Information Risk of Earnings Management, Performance Volatility,and Audit Opinions:How to Escape from Listed Companies with Extremely Suspect Earnings Management?

Audit Fees, Motivation Of Avoiding Loss And Opinion Shopping Test For Moderating Effect Based On Evidences Of Chinese Stock Market From 2001 To 2008

Earnings Management,Information Risk and Audit Opinion

Unfavorable audit opinion,audit fees and opinion shopping

Informativeness of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China

Auditing Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Audit Opinions and Restatements

Annual report inquiry letters, disclosure of key audit matters and audit fees: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies

Regulated Changes in Audit Fee Disclosure and Improvement of Audit Environment:Evidence from China's Auditing Market

Economic Consequence of the Revision on Audit Report Standard: Empirical Evidence from Capital Market

Audit fees, motivation of avoiding loss and opinion shopping

Informativeness of the Expanded Audit Report: Evidence from China