Abstract:The requirement for U.S. investigators to obtain “traditional” in-depth informed consent consisting of the eight “required” elements when performing collaborative research in international settings can present significant cultural challenges to obtaining individual informed consent and hence preclude the conduct of important research. The Common Rule, however, offers flexibility by specifying four criteria for when a waiver of consent can be approved or when any of the eight required elements of informed consent can be “altered” (the same standards apply to both situations). These criteria include: (1) subjects are exposed to no more than minimal risk; (2) the waiver or alteration does not adversely affect subject rights and welfare; (3) the research could not practicably be carried out without the waiver or alteration; and (4) subjects will be provided with additional pertinent information after participation, when appropriate (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1991a). However, institutional review boards (IRBs) may interpret the “impracticableness” requirement narrowly; use variable concepts of “minimal risks”; and link participants’ “rights” exclusively to autonomy interests, which may not be relevant in other cultural contexts. Neil Dickert and colleagues reframe the concept of a “valid” consent by detailing other ethical functions that consent promotes, beyond that of an autonomous authorization. Several focused at the participant level include (a) providing transparency, (b) allowing control and authorization, (c) promoting concordance with participants’ values, and (d) protecting and promoting welfare interests (Dickert et al. 2017). Their analysis helps them argue that it would still be ethically meaningful to partially engage potential participants in enrollment decisions with an “altered” consent process rather than a complete waiver in certain types of research. Our agenda is different, as we intend to show how consideration of their additional ethical functions can broaden the meaning of “impracticableness” and expand on the concept of “rights” to justify an “altered” consent process rather than requiring a traditional in-depth informed consent in international settings where different cultural norms exist. We anchor our discussion on a case involving a randomized crossover trial comparing adjuvant surgical oophorectomy and tamoxifen against placebo for breast cancer in Vietnam that took place in 1992–1993 and represented collaborative research between U.S. and local investigators (Love and Fost 1997). Due to lack of resources and systems of care in Vietnam, systemic adjuvant treatments were only occasionally used and when administered, followed regimens unlikely to achieve effectiveness. The investigators were made aware that it was not customary in Vietnam for patients to participate in their own medical decisions in the way that is normative in Western cultures. Patients expect and look to their physicians to tell them the appropriate treatment; Western notions of informed consent are inconsistent with a paternalistic style that is preferred by Vietnamese patients. While it was believed that it might be technically possible, though difficult, to discuss with Vietnamese women alternative options, an informed consent process that included alternative interventions would not be functionally relevant, as patients would defer to their doctors’ decisions regarding

Mesoporous Sno2 Nanoparticle Films As Electron-Transporting Material in Perovskite Solar Cells

Enhancing Electron Extraction and Transport in Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells Via Additional Built-in Potential of SnO2-BiFeO3 Nano-Heterostructure

Core-Shell ZnO@SnO2 Nanoparticles for Efficient Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells.

Enhanced electron extraction using SnO2 for high-efficiency planar-structure HC(NH2)2PbI3-based perovskite solar cells

Mesoporous SnO₂ Single Crystals As an Effective Electron Collector for Perovskite Solar Cells.

Applicability of a Function-Based Approach to Informed Consent in International Settings

A facile spray-assisted fabrication of homogenous flat CH3NH3PbI3 films for high performance mesostructure perovskite solar cells

Fully Inorganic CsSnI3 Mesoporous Perovskite Solar Cells with High Efficiency and Stability Via Coadditive Engineering

Interconnected SnO2 Nanocrystals Electron Transport Layer for Highly Efficient Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells

Polysaccharide Modified SnO2 for Highly Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells

Low-temperature sputtered nickel oxide compact thin film as effective electron blocking layer for mesoscopic NiO/CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite heterojunction solar cells.

Chitosan Derivatives Modified with SnO 2 for High-Efficiency Carbon-Based Perovskite Solar Cells

Optimized SnO2 preparation and coherent interlayers for enhanced charge dynamics and efficient perovskite photovoltaics

Non-ionic polymeric polyacrylamide (PAM) modified SnO 2 electron transport layer for high-efficiency perovskite solar cells

MXene-based novel nanocomposites doped SnO2 for boosting the performance of perovskite solar cells

SnO2 modified mesoporous ZrO2 as efficient electron-transport layer for carbon-electrode based, low-temperature mesoscopic perovskite solar cells

Polyelectrolyte-Doped SnO<sub>2</sub> as a Tunable Electron Transport Layer for High-Efficiency and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells

Low-temperature Preparation of SnO<sub>2</sub> Electron Transport Layer for Perovskite Solar Cells

Synthesis of Copper Zinc Tin Sulfide Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) Nanoparticles Doped Material with High Properties for CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells

Chemical bath deposition of mesoporous SnO2 to improve interface adhesion and device operational stability

Use of Anodic TiO2 Nanotube Layers as Mesoporous Scaffolds for Fabricating CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite-based Solid State Solar Cells