Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for 64-detector coronary CT angiography

郭小超,刘建新,邱建星,王继琛,孙晓伟,蒋学祥
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2009.11.019
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare scan time, blood vessel assessability, image quality and radiation dosage between prospective ECG-gating and retrospective ECG-gating technique in coronary artery imaging with 64-detector spiral CT. Methods: One hundred and thirty-three patients suspected coronary artery diseases were included and divided into experimental group (prospective ECG-gating coronary artery imaging, 68 patients) and control group (retrospective ECG-gating coronary artery imaging, 65 patients). Scan time and radiation dosage were recorded for statistics, while blood vessel assessability was calculated and image quality was evaluated. Results: The mean scan time was 7.12 s in the experimental group and 9.43 s in the control group. The percentage of assessable coronary artery segments was 94.93% (843/888) in the experimental group, whereas 94.46% (784/830) in the control group. The mean effective dosage (ED) in the experimental group was 3.69 mSv and 15.86 mSv in the control group. There was no significant difference of imaging quality between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Sixty-four-detector row CT coronary angiography performed with prospective ECG-gating has similar image quality but lower patient radiation dose compared with that of retrospective ECG-gating.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?