The comparative study of different scanning modes in coronary angiography using second-generation dual-source CT without HR intervention

Haifeng GU,Li QI,Yonghua XU,Ling ZHENG
2016-01-01
Journal of Medical Imaging
Abstract:Objective To investigate the differences of image quality and radiation dose of three different scan modes without any intervention in heart rate on the second-generation dual-source CT .Methods A total of 350 patients underwent CTCA exami-nation using the second-generation dual-source CT then were divided into 3 groups.150 cases were classified as Group A using retrospective ECG-gated helical scanning mode , another 150 cases were classified as Group B using prospective ECG-triggered se-quential acquisition , the last 50 cases ( Heart rate <70 beats per minute ) were classified as Group C using prospective ECG-trig-gered high-pitch scan mode ( FLASH) .Group A and B were then divided into three subgroups based on the average heart rate:50 patients for groupA1with heart rate <70 beats per minute (bpm) and 50 patients for group B1with heart rate <70 bpm;50 pa-tients for group A2 with heart rate higher than 70 bpm and lower than 80 bpm and 50 patients for group B2 with the same heart rate range;50 patients for group A3 with heart rate >80 bpm and 50 patients for group B3with the same heart rate range .At last, 50 patients for group C were with heart rate <70 bpm.The scan phase (RR-interval) of each group selected for groupA1and B1 was 60%~80%, for Group A2 and B2 was 30%~80%, for Group A3 and B3 was 30%~50%.The radiation dose for each patients was recorded and the coronary artery CT values , signal to noise ratio ( SNR) and contrast to noise ratio ( CNR) were measured and compared .Two radiologists reviewed and scored all images using a 4-point scale .Results The radiation dose sorted accord-ing to high to low were A2>A1, A3, B2>B1, B3>C.Both the subjective or objective image quality were not significantly dif-ferent among these groups .Conclusion FLASH scanning mode should be recommended for patients with suitable heart rate while prospective scanning mode is alternative .Retrospective scanning mode should only be used when the patients have arrhythmia or cardiac function analysis and dynamic 4D heart imaging are wanted .In addition, the scan window should be reduced as narrow as possible according to the patients ’ heart rate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?