A learning curve of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and its contributing factors
董健文,戎利民,冯丰,刘斌,徐义春,王其友,陈瑞强,谢沛根
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2013.04.006
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy ( PELD ) via transforaminal approach, and to analyze its main contributing factors. Methods 100 consecutive patients with lumbar disc herniation who received PELD via transforaminal approach from February 2011 to December 2012 were divided into chronological groups ( group A-E ), with 20 patients in each group. There were 68 males and 32 females, with an average age of 44 years old. Disc protrusion was located at L3-4 in 3 cases, L4-5 in 58 cases and L5-S1 in 39 cases. Posterolateral herniation was in 78 cases, far lateral herniation in 4 cases, central herniation in 5 cases and mixed type herniation in 13 cases. Of 100 cases, there were 15 cases with lateral recess and/or foraminal stenosis, 7 cases with calcified disc herniation, 8 cases with recurrent herniation and 1 case with disc herniation at adjacent segments after fusion surgery. All the operations were performed by the same team of spine surgeons with over 8-year experience of microendoscopic discectomy ( MED ). The operation time of establishing working channel and endoscopic procedure, as well as the amount of X-ray exposure in each group were recorded. The surgical results and postoperative complications were also evaluated and compared. Results The mean operation time at L3-4, L4-5 and L5-S1 was ( 100.33±9.64 ), ( 106.31±31.01 ) and ( 118.55±29.54 ) minutes respectively. The mean total operation time in each group ( group A-E ) was ( 152.20±24.48 ), ( 121.45±21.88 ), ( 103.30±15.79 ), ( 88.90±12.93 ) and ( 88.05±17.83 ) minutes respectively. In group D, the total operation time and the operation time of endoscopic procedure was significantly decreased when compared with that in group A, B and C respectively ( P<0.05 ), which was not significantly different from that in group E. The operation time of establishing working channel and the fluoroscopy time was ( 22.10±4.87 ) minutes and ( 82.45±18.23 ) seconds respectively in group C, which was significantly decreased when compared with that in group A and B respectively ( P<0.05 ). There was no statistically significant difference in the operation time of establishing working channel and the fluoroscopy time between group D and E ( P>0.05 ). There was 1 case in group B with dural laceration without cerebrospinal fluid leakage postoperatively, 1 case in group C with guide wire breakage, and 1 case in group D with nerve root injuries. There was 1 case in group A and group B respectively with transient radiculalgia pain postoperatively. The excellent and good rate for clinical results reached at or above 90% according to the modified MacNab criteria from group C on the 1st day postoperatively. All patients were followed up for a mean period of 9 months ( range; 1-23 months ). The low back pain Visual Analogue Scale ( VAS ), leg pain VAS, Japanese Orthopedics Association ( JOA ) scale and Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) at the 1st month postoperatively were improved respectively when compared with that preoperatively ( P<0.01 ). 1 patient in group A received MED 3 months after the surgery due to insufficient discectomy, and there was no recurrence or reoperation for the other cases during the follow-up. Conclusions The learning curve of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy is comparatively long. It generally needs 60 to 80 cases of repetitions for a spinal surgeon to be proficient. Endoscopic procedure needs much more repetitions when compared with that establishing working channel does. The main contributing factors to overcome the learning curve include puncture, endoscopic hemostasis and decompression.