Learning Curve Of Microendoscopy-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 65 Consecutive Cases Of One Surgeon

Yang Yang,Liangming Zhang,Bin Liu,Zihao Chen,Peigen Xie,Mao Pang,Wenbin Wu,Feng Feng,Limin Rong
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the learning curve of microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) performed by one senior surgeon. Methods: A total of 65 patients suffering from lumbar degenerative disease underwent single-level microendoscopy-assisted MIS-TLIF. Piecewise regression analysis using R statistical software was performed to define the turning point of learning curve (early and plateau phase). Perioperative evaluations included surgical duration, intraoperative fluroscopic time and blood loss, postoperative analgesic usage and ambulatory time. Clinical outcome assessments involved visual analogue score (VAS) for back and leg, Japanese Orthopaedics Association score (JOA), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria. All these indicators, as well as complication incidence and interbody fusion (Birdwell classification) between both phases were compared. Results: The asymptote of learning curve was reached following previous 21 cases. Comparing latter 44 cases with first 21 cases, surgical duration (178.9 minutes versus 195.5 minutes), intra-operative fluroscopic time (53.2 seconds versus 77.5 seconds), blood loss (184.0 ml versus 205.5 ml), postoperative analgesic usage (43.0 mg versus 73.6 mg) and ambulatory time (2.1 days versus 2.6 days) revealed significant differences (all P<0.05). While at 20 months postoperation, VAS-back (0.8 versus 0.8), VAS-leg (0.7 versus 0.5), JOA (25.0 versus 25.0), ODI (12.2 versus 12.0), perfect or good assessment based on modified MacNab criteria (20/21 versus 43/44) and interbody fusion rate of grade I (18/21 versus 37/44) were nearly the same (all P>0.05). There were 5 complications (23.7%) and 10 complications (22.7%) at early and latter phase respectively, also showing no statistical significance (P>0.05). Conclusions: The turning point of this surgeon's learning curve for microendoscopy- assisted MIS-TLIF is achieved at the 21st case. Patients at its both phases acquire similar clinical outcomes, while latter patients can get additional advantages.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?