Abstract:BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study is to compare the outcomes and effectiveness of MED vs OLD for lumbar disc herniation.OBJECTIVES: To identify the functional outcomes in terms of ODI score, VAS score complications in terms of intraoperative blood loss, use of general anesthesia, and morbidity in terms of total hospital stay between MED and OLD.METHODS: In our randomized prospective study we analyzed 60 patients with clinical signs and symptoms with 2 weeks of failed conservative treatment plus MRI or CT scan findings of lumbar disc herniation who underwent MED and OLD. The study was undertaken from November 2017 to January 2019 at Guangzhou Medical University of Second Affiliated Hospital, department of orthopedic surgery in spinal Unit, Guangzhou, China. Patients were divided into 2 groups i.e. who underwent MED group and the OLD group then we compared the preoperative and postoperative ODI and VAS score, duration of total hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, and operation time.RESULTS: We evaluated 60 patients. Among them, 30 underwent MED (15 female and 15 male) and 30 underwent OLD 14 male 16 female. Surgical and anesthesia time was significantly shorter, blood loss and hospital stay were significantly reduced in patients having MED than OLD (<0.005). The improvement in the ODI in both groups was clinically significant and statistically (P < .005) at postoperative 1st day (with greater improvement in the MED group), at 6 weeks (P > .005), month 6 (>0.005) statistically no significant. The clinical improvement was similar in both groups. VAS and ODI scores improved significantly postoperatively in both groups. However, the MED group was superior to the OLD group with less time in bed, shorter operation time, less blood loss which is clinically and statistically significant (P < .05).CONCLUSIONS: The standard surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation has been open discectomy but there has been a trend towards minimally invasive procedures. MED for lumbar spine disc herniation is a well-known but developing field, which is increasingly spreading in the last few years. The success rate of MED is about approximately 90%. Both methods are equally effective in relieving radicular pain. MED was superior in terms of total hospital stay, morbidity, and earlier return to work and anesthetic exposure, blood loss, intra-op time comparing to OLD. MED is a safe and effective alternative to conventional OLD for patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Comparision of Surgical Outcomes Between Microsnrgical Lumbar Discectomy and Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical application of microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of Outcomes Between Tubular Microdiscectomy and Conventional Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparison of Discectomy Versus Sequestrectomy in Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Effects Between Traditional Open Discectomy and Microendoscopy (MED) for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Minimal incision surgery treatment for lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for single-segment lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of the effectiveness and outcome of microendoscopic and open discectomy in patients suffering from lumbar disc herniation

Comparative Study of Microendoscopic Disecetomy and Fenestration Discectomy for Mono-Segment Lumbar Disc Herniation

Operative Indication and Therapeutic Efficancy of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Microendoscopic Discectomy

Minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: current concepts, surgical techniques, and outcomes

Comparison of the Outcomes of Microendoscopic Discectomy Versus Full-Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of L4/5 Lumbar Disc Herniation

Surgical treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation by microendoscopic discectomy through posterior approach

Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Effect of Partial Sleep Deprivation After Strenuous Exercise on Muscular Strength and Endurance Capacity: 3739 Board #178 June 4, 9: 30 AM - 11: 00 AM.

Early outcomes of surgical treatment with microdiscectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation

Micro Lumbar Discectomy under Arthroscopy

Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for single l4/5‐level lumbar disk herniation

Comparison of one-hole split endoscopic discectomy and microendoscopic discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disk herniation: a one-year retrospective cohort study

Effects of different surgical treatments on pain, disability, anxiety and quality of life in lumbar disc herniation.

Comparison of Endoscope-Assisted and Microscope-Assisted Tubular Surgery for Lumbar Laminectomies and Discectomies: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Results