Abstract:For lumbar disc herniation with bilateral radiculopathy, using the full‐endoscopic visualized foraminoplasty and discectomy (FEVFD) technique could not only reduce the operation time and radiation, but also improve the clinical outcomes at the L5/S1 level as compared with the transforaminal endoscopic surgical system (TESSYS) technique. Objective The treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with bilateral radiculopathy using transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) remains challenging, especially at the L5/S1 level with narrow foramen or high iliac crest. Full‐endoscopic visualized foraminoplasty and discectomy (FEVFD) is a newly developed technique for LDH and lumbar stenosis. However, there is limited evidence on the efficacy of FEVFD technique in the treatment of LDH with bilateral radiculopathy. This study was to assess the clinical outcomes and safety of using FEVFD in the treatment of LDH with bilateral radiculopathy. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 63 patients with LDH presenting with bilateral radiculopathy between January 2018 and January 2022. Patients enrolled before January 2020 were treated using a conventional transforaminal endoscopic surgical system (TESSYS) technique (TESSYS, n = 33) and treated using a FEVFD technique after that (FEVFD, n = 30). The total operation time and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies were recorded. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively (at 1‐month, 3‐month, 6‐month, and final follow‐ups). Global outcomes at final follow‐up were assessed using modified MacNab criteria. Results Compared with TESSYS, patients in FEVFD group had a shorter operation time (92.9 vs. 78.0 min). The intraoperative fluoroscopies in FEVFD group were significantly lower than those in TESSYS group (18.7 vs. 4.9). After the operation, the VAS and ODI scores at all follow‐ups in the two groups were significantly lower than those before operation. For the L5/S1 level, the values of VAS and ODI scores in FEVFD group were significantly lower than those of in TESSYS group at 3‐month, 6‐month, and final follow‐up. For the L4/5 level, however, no significant difference was found in VAS and ODI scores between these two groups at the follow‐ups. According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent‐to‐good rate in TESSYS and FEVFD groups was 84.8% and 90.0%, respectively. Conclusion For LDH with bilateral radiculopathy, using the FEVFD technique could not only reduce the operation time and radiation, but also improve the clinical outcomes at the L5/S1 level.

Comparison of the Outcomes of Microendoscopic Discectomy Versus Full-Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of L4/5 Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of Outcomes Between Tubular Microdiscectomy and Conventional Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparison of Discectomy Versus Sequestrectomy in Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Clinical application of microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

MRI Changes of Adjacent Segments after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Foraminal Endoscopy: A Case-Control Study.

Surgical Strategy and Outcomes of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation Following a Previous Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy, Chemonucleolysis, Microdiscectomy, and Microendoscopic Discectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: One-year Follow-up Clinical Results and Disc Degeneration

Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for single-segment lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of the effectiveness and outcome of microendoscopic and open discectomy in patients suffering from lumbar disc herniation

Minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: current concepts, surgical techniques, and outcomes

Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Comparative Study of Microendoscopic Disecetomy and Fenestration Discectomy for Mono-Segment Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy: a follow-up exceeding five years

Comparative Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Between Transforaminal and Interlaminar Approach: a Minimum Two Year Follow-Up.

Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for single l4/5‐level lumbar disk herniation

Comparing Quality of Life: Discectomy Surgery versus Epidural Corticosteroid Injection for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Effects Between Traditional Open Discectomy and Microendoscopy (MED) for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and open lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical Outcomes of Full‐Endoscopic Visualized Foraminoplasty and Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Bilateral Radiculopathy

Comparative outcomes of obese and non-obese patients with lumbar disc herniation receiving full endoscopic transforaminal discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of full-endoscopic foraminoplasty and lumbar discectomy (FEFLD), unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) discectomy, and microdiscectomy (MD) for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation