Abstract:BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study is to compare the outcomes and effectiveness of MED vs OLD for lumbar disc herniation.OBJECTIVES: To identify the functional outcomes in terms of ODI score, VAS score complications in terms of intraoperative blood loss, use of general anesthesia, and morbidity in terms of total hospital stay between MED and OLD.METHODS: In our randomized prospective study we analyzed 60 patients with clinical signs and symptoms with 2 weeks of failed conservative treatment plus MRI or CT scan findings of lumbar disc herniation who underwent MED and OLD. The study was undertaken from November 2017 to January 2019 at Guangzhou Medical University of Second Affiliated Hospital, department of orthopedic surgery in spinal Unit, Guangzhou, China. Patients were divided into 2 groups i.e. who underwent MED group and the OLD group then we compared the preoperative and postoperative ODI and VAS score, duration of total hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, and operation time.RESULTS: We evaluated 60 patients. Among them, 30 underwent MED (15 female and 15 male) and 30 underwent OLD 14 male 16 female. Surgical and anesthesia time was significantly shorter, blood loss and hospital stay were significantly reduced in patients having MED than OLD (<0.005). The improvement in the ODI in both groups was clinically significant and statistically (P < .005) at postoperative 1st day (with greater improvement in the MED group), at 6 weeks (P > .005), month 6 (>0.005) statistically no significant. The clinical improvement was similar in both groups. VAS and ODI scores improved significantly postoperatively in both groups. However, the MED group was superior to the OLD group with less time in bed, shorter operation time, less blood loss which is clinically and statistically significant (P < .05).CONCLUSIONS: The standard surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation has been open discectomy but there has been a trend towards minimally invasive procedures. MED for lumbar spine disc herniation is a well-known but developing field, which is increasingly spreading in the last few years. The success rate of MED is about approximately 90%. Both methods are equally effective in relieving radicular pain. MED was superior in terms of total hospital stay, morbidity, and earlier return to work and anesthetic exposure, blood loss, intra-op time comparing to OLD. MED is a safe and effective alternative to conventional OLD for patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Effects Between Traditional Open Discectomy and Microendoscopy (MED) for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical application of microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Comparasion of the tissue invasiveness and the clinical effects of lumbar disc herniation treated by microendoscopic discectomy and traditional open operation

Analysis of Reoperation Causes of Microinvasive Endoscopic Discectomy and That of Open Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparative study of clinical effect between microendoscopic discectomy and microsurgical lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniations

Comparison of clinical outcomes between microsurgical lumbar discectomy and microendoscopic discectomy

Comparision of Surgical Outcomes Between Microsnrgical Lumbar Discectomy and Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Operative Indication and Therapeutic Efficancy of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Microendoscopic Discectomy

A Prospective Study of Microendoscopic Discectomy for Single Level Lumbar Disc Herniation

Microdiscectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

Comparative Study of Microendoscopic Disecetomy and Fenestration Discectomy for Mono-Segment Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of the effectiveness and outcome of microendoscopic and open discectomy in patients suffering from lumbar disc herniation

A prospective study of microscope-assisted discectomy versus open fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for single-segment lumbar disc herniation

Clinical Efficacy Comparison between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Discectomy when Treating Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation

Operative treatmeat of the lumbar disc herniation with microendoscopic discectomy

Comparison of mid-term effects between microendoscopic discectomy and microsurgical lumbar discectomy for operatively treating lumbar disc herniation

A Retrospective Study of Improved System of Micro-Endoscopic Discectomy for the Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis

Therapeutic Effects of Microendoscopic Discectomy on Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Meta-analysis of Microdiscectomy Versus Standard Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparative study on lumbar microsurgery lumbar discectomy and traditional open discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation