Abstract:Objective: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) cannot be prevented after full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD), and the optimal surgical treatment for RLDH after FELD remains controversial. The aim of the study was to suggest a surgical strategy for FELD to treat RLDH following a previous FELD and to present surgical outcomes. Methods: Between February 2015 and March 2022, 68 patients with RLDH were surgically treated with FELD retrospectively. An original approach was suggested for the treatment of early recurrence (24 h-2 weeks). The full endoscopic transforaminal technique (FETD) was considered for patients requiring local anesthesia, and in RLDH with FETD indications or FEID technological difficulties. The full endoscopic interlaminar technique (FEID) was chosen in RLDH with FEID indications. Both FEID and FETD were suitable if no FEID or FETD technological difficulties existed. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria. Postoperative follow-up data at 24 h, 3 months, and final-follow-up were recorded. Operation time and clinical outcomes were assessed with t test. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: All 68 patients had an average follow-up time of 23.8 months (range, 6-76 months). In the 13 cases of early recurrence, the operation time (32.30 ± 9.67 vs. 58.00 ± 6.16 min) in the original surgical approach group was shorter than that in the changing surgical approach group (p < 0.05). In the 28 cases of L4/5 FETD recurrence (>2 weeks), the operation time (66.17 ± 12.18 vs. 53.60 ± 5.45 min) in the FETD group was more than that in the FEID group (p < 0.05). In the 22 cases of L5S1 recurrence (>2 weeks), the operation time (55.75 ± 8.79 vs. 79.33 ± 6.65 min) in the FEID group was shorter than in the FETD group (p < 0.05). The postoperative VAS and ODI scores at 24 h, 3 months, and final-follow up were all significantly improved, compared with their preoperative counterparts (p < 0.05). Based on the modified MacNab criteria, 88.23% of patients showed excellent or good results. Re-recurrence occurred in three patients at 3 months. No surgical complications were observed in any of the 68 cases. Conclusion: FELD is a safe and effective treatment option for RLDH with previous FELD. For early recurrence, the original approach was suggested. Both FEID and FETD were effective and safe for recurrence (>2 weeks), but FEID seemed more efficient for L4/5 RLDH after previous FETD and for L5S1 RLDH.

Clinical Experience and Results of Lumbar Microendoscopic Discectomy: a Study with a Five‐year Follow‐up

Clinical application of microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Operative Indication and Therapeutic Efficancy of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Microendoscopic Discectomy

Surgical treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation by microendoscopic discectomy through posterior approach

Management of Recurrent Herniations after Microendoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy: a follow-up exceeding five years

Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Effects Between Traditional Open Discectomy and Microendoscopy (MED) for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of mid-term effects between microendoscopic discectomy and microsurgical lumbar discectomy for operatively treating lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of the Outcomes of Microendoscopic Discectomy Versus Full-Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of L4/5 Lumbar Disc Herniation

A Study on Mid-Term Effects of Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation

Operative treatmeat of the lumbar disc herniation with microendoscopic discectomy

Comparison of the effectiveness and outcome of microendoscopic and open discectomy in patients suffering from lumbar disc herniation

Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation: Five-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Study on Posterior Approach Microendoscopic Discectomy for Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: current concepts, surgical techniques, and outcomes

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy <i>via</i> the medial foraminal and interlaminar approaches: A comparative study with 2-year follow-up

Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Early outcomes of surgical treatment with microdiscectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for single-segment lumbar disc herniation

Surgical Strategy and Outcomes of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation Following a Previous Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microsurgical Laminotomy