Abstract:The amendments to the Securities Law of China solved many issues that had not been addressed in the old version. The Supreme People’s Court rules on securities fraud litigation further added life and meaning to enforcement against securities misconduct. However, problems remain as to the lack of private lawsuit remedy for investors who suffer losses arising from insider trading and market manipulation, the controversial requirement of a prior administrative or criminal ruling and difficulties in pursuing a class action against fraudulent disclosure. In contrast, the US securities fraud litigation is very dynamic yet rife with injustice and misallocation of incentives and liabilities. It has been showed that these troubles in the US system, rooted in the openness of issuers to suits, is probably the exact scenario sought to be avoided in China where the issuers of securities are still largely controlled by the state and the government is concerned about the social chaos that might accompany a wave of collective private lawsuits. After reviewing the experiments in Germany and Taiwan, this essay proposes to further coordinate the efforts of public and private securities enforcement and suggests that the “reform and opening up” policy should be further strengthened to encourage greater private participation in domestic markets.

Examinations of the Plaintiff Qualifications in Administrative Cases in the Regulation of the Securities Market

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

On Examining Legality of Regulatory Documents in Administrative Litigation

Analysis and Reflection in the Theory of Litigant Qualification———The Reconstruction of Litigant Qualification in our state

Research on plaintiff qualification of the environmental civil public interest litigation

Examination of Several Controversial Issues in the Administrative Litigation Law (Draft)

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

Standard of Law Interest:the Fitting Choice of the Qualification Standard of Plaintiff in Administrative Litigation in Our Country

On the issue of Qualification for the Proper Party in Modern Litigation

Solutions on the Problems Caused by China's Legal Scope of Securities

Some Suggestions on Amending Administrative Litigation Law in China

Examination and Perfection of Consumer Public Interest Litigation System

The Analysis Of Administrative Litigation Procedure

Reflection on the Administration System Reform of Chinese Judicial Qualification

The Litigant Advantage in Judicial Review

On the Necessity and Feasibility of Governing Examination by Law——Taking the Example of the Substituting Examinee

The Fledgling Securities Fraud Litigation in China

A Comparative Study and Learning from the Qualifications of the Plaintiff in the Environmental Litigation of Public Good——Taking the Example of the U.S.A., India and the EU

China’s Antitrust Administrative Litigations: Problems and Solutions

Theoretical Examination and Systematic Reconstruction on Mediation of Administrative Litigation in China