Abstract:China introduced civil and administrative public interest litigation (PIL) through a series of pilot projects and legislative revisions in recent years. Now a procuratorate has the standing to bring civil PIL cases against polluters and administrative PIL cases against administrative agencies in its jurisdictions while a qualified non-governmental organization (NGO) has no geographic limits and may bring civil PIL cases against polluters anywhere in mainland China. Previous literature focused on the use of PIL for redressing environmental damages in individual cases. This paper studies the function of PIL beyond individual cases with game theory. This paper uses data collected through autoethnography, interviews, databases of judgements, statistics, and previous literature. This paper finds that local procuratorates and NGOs brought a large number of environmental PIL cases and changed the behavior patterns of local governments and their environmental protection agencies as well as that of polluters. Before the introduction of PIL rules, governmental officers of local governments and their environmental protection agencies were more discretionary and selective in environmental law enforcement and were more cooperative with polluters. After the law introduced PIL rules, they are now less discretionary in environmental law enforcement, less cooperative with polluters, and more likely to strictly enforce the environmental law. This paper models the interaction between local governments and polluters before the introduction of environmental PIL as an infinitely repeated game and reveals the ensuing cooperation. This infinitely repeated game was broken by new players introduced by the PIL, i.e., the procuratorate, NGOs, and the court, which changed the behavior patterns of the local government and its environmental protection agencies as well as that of polluters. This paper concludes that the function of PIL beyond individual cases lies in that it breaks the chain of infinitely repeated game between the local government and polluters and thus changes their behavior patterns.

Research on plaintiff qualification of the environmental civil public interest litigation

A Comparative Study and Learning from the Qualifications of the Plaintiff in the Environmental Litigation of Public Good——Taking the Example of the U.S.A., India and the EU

[Environmental Damage Assessment: International Regulations and Revelation to China].

Types of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China and Exploration of New Frontiers

Environmental public interest litigation: new roles for civil society organizations in environmental governance in China

On the Environmental Public Interest Litigation Mechanism for Public Participation

Group Litigation System about Environment Infringement

On the Dilemma and Outlet of the Environmental Civil Litigation in China

New Procuratorial Role in Marine Environmental Public Interest Litigation

Evaluation on the Achievements of Environmental Public Interest Litigation against the Pollution in a Typical Lake in China

A conceptional game theory analysis of environmental public interest litigation of China

An empirical study of marine environmental civil public-interest litigation in China: Based on 216 cases from 2015 through 2022

On The Expansion of Plaintiff’s Standing and Reasonable Limit in Environmental Litigation

The Function and Procedure of the Civil Public Interests Litigation

DEBATES ON"PUBLIC INTERESTS"IN URBAN PLANNING

Reforming Land Public Interest Litigation in China: Addressing Legal and Practical Barriers

Legal aspects of judicial protection of citizens’ rights and public interests in the field of environmental protection in the people’s Republic of China

Research on the Judicial Application of The Punitive Damages System for Environmental Infringement

The Dilemma and Countermeasures of Public Interest Litigation of Marine Environmental Pollution in China

Is Public Participation Weak Environmental Regulation? Experience from China's Environmental Public Interest Litigation Pilots

An empirical examination of liability for ecological environment restoration in the context of the Civil Code of China