A Comparative Study and Learning from the Qualifications of the Plaintiff in the Environmental Litigation of Public Good——Taking the Example of the U.S.A., India and the EU

WU Wei-xing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8860.2011.03.020

2011-01-01

Abstract:China's research of environmental litigation of public good should step out of the American-centered pattern and carries out a comparative analysis with a broader perspective.As the origin of environmental litigation of public good,the qualifications of the plaintiff takes the criterion of injury in fact while India takes the criterion of sufficient interest.Although the EU's system came out late,it develops quickly and has established the mode of a pure litigation of public good,i.e.,imposing the qualifications of the plaintiff on environmental protection groups which conforms to certain criteria and get no benefits from the case.Our legislation should be centered on environmental administration litigation of public good and confine the qualifications of the plaintiff to environmental NGOs.