Abstract:Pressured by globalization and the increasing demand for public organisations to be accountable, efficient and transparent, university rankings have become an important tool for assessing the quality of higher education institutions. It is therefore important to carefully assess exactly what these rankings measure. In this paper, the three major global university rankings, The Academic Ranking of World Universities, The Times Higher Education and the Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings, are studied. After a description of the ranking methodologies, it is shown that university rankings are stable over time but that there is variation between the three rankings. Furthermore, using Principal Component Analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis, we show that the variables used to construct the rankings primarily measure two underlying factors: a universities reputation and its research performance. By correlating these factors and plotting regional aggregates of universities on the two factors, differences between the rankings are made visible. Last, we elaborate how the results from these analysis can be viewed in light of often voiced critiques of the ranking process. This indicates that the variables used by the rankings might not capture the concepts they claim to measure. Doing so the study provides evidence of the ambiguous nature of university ranking's quantification of university performance.

Researching on the value orientation of University Ranking——Based on the interpretation of Value Philosophy

The Value Pursuit of World-Class Universities

Examples and Analysis on University Ranking in Foreign Countries

International University Evaluation:Value and Choice

Discussion on Undergraduates' Sports Value Orientation

University Rankings:Either Raising Level or Optimizing System: The Review on Ellen Hazelkorn's Rankings Views

The Paradigm Evolution of Contemporary Western Value Ranking Theory:From Scheler,Hartman to Dewey

University Rankings and Classifications Based on the Ideas of System Diversity:Practices and Implications

Competition between College Rivalries in the Era of University Ranking

A Longitudinal Analysis of University Rankings

Analysis on Ranking Methodology of U.S.News & World Report Ranking of Graduate Schools and Its Enlightenments

Researching on the Value Base of the Modern University Personnel System——Based on the epistemology of the value relationship between subject and object

Global Universities Rankings:Higher Education as a Market

Discussion on the Meanings and Problems of University Ranking in China

Explaining the Paradox of World University Rankings in China: Higher Education Sustainability Analysis with Sentiment Analysis and LDA Topic Modeling

Analysis of the World High Impact University Ranking in Australia and Its Inspiration to China

Value Priorities among Chinese University Students in Social Transition

Research on Values of the Reform of Higher Education in China

Comprehensive evaluation of university competitiveness based on DD-TOPSIS method

The Value Ranking and the Innovation of Contemporary Moral Education Model

A New Multicriteria Decision Making Approach for University Ranking: the Skyline SIR Method.