Abstract:Pressured by globalization and the increasing demand for public organisations to be accountable, efficient and transparent, university rankings have become an important tool for assessing the quality of higher education institutions. It is therefore important to carefully assess exactly what these rankings measure. In this paper, the three major global university rankings, The Academic Ranking of World Universities, The Times Higher Education and the Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings, are studied. After a description of the ranking methodologies, it is shown that university rankings are stable over time but that there is variation between the three rankings. Furthermore, using Principal Component Analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis, we show that the variables used to construct the rankings primarily measure two underlying factors: a universities reputation and its research performance. By correlating these factors and plotting regional aggregates of universities on the two factors, differences between the rankings are made visible. Last, we elaborate how the results from these analysis can be viewed in light of often voiced critiques of the ranking process. This indicates that the variables used by the rankings might not capture the concepts they claim to measure. Doing so the study provides evidence of the ambiguous nature of university ranking's quantification of university performance.

Competition between College Rivalries in the Era of University Ranking

History and Cultural Heritage of the Research University

On the Nature and Phenomena of College Entrance Exmination Competition

University Rankings:Either Raising Level or Optimizing System: The Review on Ellen Hazelkorn's Rankings Views

Interaction of the Times and Characters:An Overview of the University Students Enrolled in 1977 and 1978

The Space Theory of University Competition: Space and Strategy

China's policy responses to university ranking: changes and new challenges

Tuition too high? Blame competition

A Longitudinal Analysis of University Rankings

Global Universities Rankings:Higher Education as a Market

Adding an international lens to the university striving model: How both global and national indicators influence the Chinese higher education hierarchy

University Rankings and Classifications Based on the Ideas of System Diversity:Practices and Implications

Pursuit of Fairness:Perhaps It is the Root Cause of University Entrance Examination to Make Mistakes

Discussion on the Meanings and Problems of University Ranking in China

Let nine universities blossom: opportunities and constraints on the development of higher education in China

Have you “involution” today—Competition psychology scale for college students

The Origin and Consequences of Excess Competition in Education

Explaining the Paradox of World University Rankings in China: Higher Education Sustainability Analysis with Sentiment Analysis and LDA Topic Modeling

Commensuration of the globalised higher education sector: how university rankings act as a credential for world-class status in China

A Study on the Competitiveness of Asian Universities--Using Different University Rankings as Examples

Train to Compete:Roots and consequences of Excessive Competition