Abstract:Abstract Purpose Building on Leydesdorff, Bornmann, and Mingers (2019), we elaborate the differences between Tsinghua and Zhejiang University as an empirical example. We address the question of whether differences are statistically significant in the rankings of Chinese universities. We propose methods for measuring statistical significance among different universities within or among countries. Design/methodology/approach Based on z -testing and overlapping confidence intervals, and using data about 205 Chinese universities included in the Leiden Rankings 2020, we argue that three main groups of Chinese research universities can be distinguished (low, middle, and high). Findings When the sample of 205 Chinese universities is merged with the 197 US universities included in Leiden Rankings 2020, the results similarly indicate three main groups: low, middle, and high. Using this data (Leiden Rankings and Web of Science), the z -scores of the Chinese universities are significantly below those of the US universities albeit with some overlap. Research limitations We show empirically that differences in ranking may be due to changes in the data, the models, or the modeling effects on the data. The scientometric groupings are not always stable when we use different methods. Practical implications Differences among universities can be tested for their statistical significance. The statistics relativize the values of decimals in the rankings. One can operate with a scheme of low/middle/high in policy debates and leave the more fine-grained rankings of individual universities to operational management and local settings. Originality/value In the discussion about the rankings of universities, the question of whether differences are statistically significant, has, in our opinion, insufficiently been addressed in research evaluations.

Analysis on Ranking Methodology of U.S.News & World Report Ranking of Graduate Schools and Its Enlightenments

Examples and Analysis on University Ranking in Foreign Countries

Comparison and analysis of scientific competitive index in Chinese hospital ranking list

University Rankings:Either Raising Level or Optimizing System: The Review on Ellen Hazelkorn's Rankings Views

Analysis of the World High Impact University Ranking in Australia and Its Inspiration to China

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Study on the Difference between China and the U.S.Indicator System from Cultural Background

Status,Disparities and Path of"World-class University"Construction in China Based on University Rankings

A Review of QS World University Rankings by Subject and Its Enlightenment to China

University Rankings: Status, Dilemma, Prospect

On evaluation of tertiary and vocational colleges in China--Some comments about current university rank

Is Bigger, Better? Exploring U.S. News Graduate Education Program Rankings and Internet Characteristics

Discussion on the Meanings and Problems of University Ranking in China

The Implications of the U.S. Primary Health Care and Medical Education Ranking on the Reform of China's Medical Education Evaluation

Are University Rankings Statistically Significant? A Comparison among Chinese Universities and with the USA

Academic Ranking of World Universities Using Scientometrics - A Comment to the “fatal Attraction”

Global Universities Rankings:Higher Education as a Market

An Critical Analysis of the World University Rankings by the Times Higher Education Supplement

Implications for neurosurgery of medical schools leaving the United States News and World Report

Study on evaluation index system of China private college ranking

Academic Ranking of World Universities: Present and Future