Comparison between two types of microkeratomes in LASIK

HUANG Yue,ZHAO Shaozhen,SUN Huimin,黄悦,赵绍贞,孙慧敏
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-1801.2007.03.008
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical effects of corneal flaps made by the Moria M2 130 plastic single-use microkeratome and the M2 Microkeratome blade in LASIK. Methods Fifty-nine patients (113 eyes) were randomly divided into two groups. The Moria M2 130 single-use microkeratome was used in group I (n=61) and the M2 microkeratome blade was used in group II (n=52) for LASIK. The suction ring was chosen according to corneal curvature and the stop-ring was adjusted to the 8.0mm position. The lengths of the corneal flaps and flap hinges, the thickness of the corneal flaps, and complications were recorded during and after operations. Results Mean corneal flap thickness in groups I and II was (139.35±19.07)μm and (126.92±11.50)μm, respectively. All flaps were successfully made and had no severe complications. 17% of the flaps had slight hemorrhaging during the procedure and the hemorrhaging stopped after the operation. There was no obvious metal debris under the flaps in group I but there was debris in group II. One case of DLK (grade I) was detected in group II and disappeared after one week. Conclusion It is safe and stable to use either the M2 single-use microkeratome or the M2 microkeratome blade in LASIK. Neither had severe complications. The M2 single-use microkeratome is convenient and the interface is clean, but the mean thickness of the corneal flaps and the standard deviation were higher, which is a risk factor when estimating the thickness of the remaining cornea. The corneal flap is more stable when using the M2 microkeratome blade, but there was more metal debris under the flap.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?