Femtosecond Laser Versus Mechanical Microkeratome Laser in Situ Keratomileusis for Myopia: Metaanalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Zhi-Flua Zhang,Hui-Yi Jin,Yan Suo,Sanjay V. Patel,Robert Montes-Mico,Edward E. Manche,Xun Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.043
2011-01-01
Abstract:PURPOSE: To examine differences in efficacy, accuracy, safety, and changes in aberrations between femtosecond and mechanical microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai First People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.DESIGN: Evidence-based manuscript.METHODS: Data sources, including PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, were searched to identify potentially relevant prospective randomized controlled trials. Primary outcome measures were efficacy (uncorrected distance visual acuity >= 20/20), accuracy (+/- 0.50 diopter mean spherical equivalent), and safety (loss of >= 2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity). Aberrations and postoperative complications were secondary outcomes.RESULTS: Seven prospective randomized controlled trials describing a total of 577 eyes with myopia were included in this metaanalysis. At 6 months or more follow-up, no significant differences were found in the efficacy (odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.40 to 3.42; P=.78), accuracy (OR, 1.69; 95% Cl, 0.68 to 4.20; P=.26), or safety (OR, 7.37; 95% Cl, 0.37 to 147.61; P=.19). In eyes that had femtosecond LASIK, the postoperative total aberrations (mean difference -0.03 mu m; 95% Cl, -0.05 to -0.01; P=.002) and spherical aberrations (mean difference -0.02 mu m; 95% Cl, -0.03 to -0.01; P<.00001) were significantly lower.CONCLUSIONS: According to the metaanalysis, femtosecond LASIK did not have an advantage in efficacy, accuracy, and safety measures over mechanical microkeratome LASIK in the early and midterm follow-up, although it might induce fewer aberrations.