Abstract:Purpose: This study aims to compare the changes in the corneal wavefront aberrations and the objective visual quality resulting from two types of eye surgery-small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK)-in patients with moderate-to-high myopia. Methods: A prospective analysis was performed on 98 eyes of 51 patients who underwent SMILE. Additionally, 88 eyes of 45 patients who underwent FS-LASIK were analyzed. All patients underwent ocular examination preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Corneal aberrations and objective visual quality were measured using the Optical Quality Analysis System II (OQAS II) and Optical Path Difference Scan III (OPD-Scan III). Results: At postoperative 1 day and 1 week, there was a statistically significant difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) between SMILE and FS-LASIK (P < 0.05). Postoperative spherical (S), cylinder (C) and spherical equivalent refraction (SE) were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). In both groups, the absolute magnitude of total higher-aberrations (tHOA), piston, vertical tilt, vertical coma, and spherical aberration (SA) increased after surgery compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in Δhorizontal tHOA, Δhorizontal tilt, Δhorizontal coma, and Δhorizontal trefoil between the two groups (P > 0.05), and the FS-LASIK had higher Δvertical trefoil and ΔSA (P < 0.05) but lower Δpiston, Δvertical tilt, and Δvertical coma than the SMILE group (P < 0.05). There was a rise in objective scattering index (OSI) and a decline in both modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff and Strehl ratio (SR) after surgery compared to preoperative values in both groups (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the OSI at 1 day and 3 months between the two groups (P < 0.05). Postoperative MTF cutoff and SR were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative OSI was positively correlated with corneal tHOA (0.261 ≤ R ≤ 0.483, P < 0.05) and was negatively correlated with vertical tilt and vertical coma (-0.315 ≤ R ≤ -0.209, P < 0.05) in both groups. Conclusion: While both SMILE and FS-LASIK can effectively correct moderate-to-high myopia, there is an increase in corneal aberrations and a postoperative delay in objective visual quality. The cornea may require a longer recovery period in the SMILE. OPD-Scan III combined with OQAS II is a useful supplementary inspection for assessing the optical quality following refractive surgery.

Objective Optical Quality and Intraocular Scatter after LASIK: Femtosecond Laser Versus Mechanical Microkeratome

Changes of dry eye parameters after femtosecond laser and conventional LASIK

A Comparative Study of the Effect of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery on Corneal Astigmatism in Post-LASIK Eyes and Virgin Eyes

Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering after Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Comparison of Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering after Femtosecond LASIK and Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lenses Implantation

Comparison of objective visual quality between SMILE and FS-LASIK in moderate-to-high myopia

Clinical investigation on contrast sensitivity and higher order aberration after Q-factor guided SBK and LASIK for myopia

Comparative study of objective visual quality between FS-LASIK and SMART in myopia

Characteristics and Correlative Factors of Posterior Corneal Surface Changes after Laser in Situ Keratomileusis

Evaluation of visual quality after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia by point spread function

Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK Versus PRK: Comparison of 6-Month Visual Acuity and Quality Outcome for High Myopia

Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer: a one-year retrospective study

Comparison of clinical results between trans-PRK and femtosecond LASIK for correction of high myopia

Refractive Outcomes Comparing Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction And Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis For High Myopia

Comparison on biomechanical stability between femtosecond laser assisted LASIK and LASEK with ocular response analyzer

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Higher-order Aberrations Between FS-LASIK and SMI-LIKE for Moderate to High Hyperopia: A 2-Year Result

Comparison of corneaI biomechanicaI changes at earIy stage after femtosecond LASIK and microkeratome LASIK

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus PRK for high myopia: comparison of 18-month visual acuity and quality

Comparison of Postoperative Visual Quality after SMILE and LASEK for High Myopia: A 1-Year Outcome.

Long-term observation of monovision surgery using femtosecond laser- assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia correction in early presbyopia