Abstract:Purpose: This study aims to compare the changes in the corneal wavefront aberrations and the objective visual quality resulting from two types of eye surgery-small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK)-in patients with moderate-to-high myopia. Methods: A prospective analysis was performed on 98 eyes of 51 patients who underwent SMILE. Additionally, 88 eyes of 45 patients who underwent FS-LASIK were analyzed. All patients underwent ocular examination preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Corneal aberrations and objective visual quality were measured using the Optical Quality Analysis System II (OQAS II) and Optical Path Difference Scan III (OPD-Scan III). Results: At postoperative 1 day and 1 week, there was a statistically significant difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) between SMILE and FS-LASIK (P < 0.05). Postoperative spherical (S), cylinder (C) and spherical equivalent refraction (SE) were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). In both groups, the absolute magnitude of total higher-aberrations (tHOA), piston, vertical tilt, vertical coma, and spherical aberration (SA) increased after surgery compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in Δhorizontal tHOA, Δhorizontal tilt, Δhorizontal coma, and Δhorizontal trefoil between the two groups (P > 0.05), and the FS-LASIK had higher Δvertical trefoil and ΔSA (P < 0.05) but lower Δpiston, Δvertical tilt, and Δvertical coma than the SMILE group (P < 0.05). There was a rise in objective scattering index (OSI) and a decline in both modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff and Strehl ratio (SR) after surgery compared to preoperative values in both groups (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the OSI at 1 day and 3 months between the two groups (P < 0.05). Postoperative MTF cutoff and SR were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative OSI was positively correlated with corneal tHOA (0.261 ≤ R ≤ 0.483, P < 0.05) and was negatively correlated with vertical tilt and vertical coma (-0.315 ≤ R ≤ -0.209, P < 0.05) in both groups. Conclusion: While both SMILE and FS-LASIK can effectively correct moderate-to-high myopia, there is an increase in corneal aberrations and a postoperative delay in objective visual quality. The cornea may require a longer recovery period in the SMILE. OPD-Scan III combined with OQAS II is a useful supplementary inspection for assessing the optical quality following refractive surgery.

Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK Versus PRK: Comparison of 6-Month Visual Acuity and Quality Outcome for High Myopia

Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus PRK for high myopia: comparison of 18-month visual acuity and quality

A Comparative Study of the Effect of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery on Corneal Astigmatism in Post-LASIK Eyes and Virgin Eyes

Comparison of clinical results between trans-PRK and femtosecond LASIK for correction of high myopia

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Higher-order Aberrations Between FS-LASIK and SMI-LIKE for Moderate to High Hyperopia: A 2-Year Result

Visual Outcomes after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for High Myopia.

Comparison of objective visual quality between SMILE and FS-LASIK in moderate-to-high myopia

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome: a retrospective comparison of visual outcomes at 3 months

Refractive Outcomes Comparing Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction And Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis For High Myopia

Refractive outcomes of high-magnitude astigmatism correction using femtosecond LASIK versus transepithelial PRK

Comparison of Efficacy and Visual Outcomes after SMILE and FS-LASIK for the Correction of High Myopia with the Sum of Myopia and Astigmatism from -10.00 to -14.00 Dioptres.

Matched comparison of corneal higher order aberrations induced by SMILE to femtosecond assisted LASIK and to PRK in correcting moderate and high myopia: 3.00mm vs. 6.00mm

Comparative study of objective visual quality between FS-LASIK and SMART in myopia

Femtosecond Laser Assisted LASIK vs SMILE : Refractive Results , Contrast Sensitivity and Corneal Higher Order Aberrations

Comparison of the visual outcomes between PRK-MMC and phakic IOL implantation in high myopic patients

Comparison of Postoperative Visual Quality after SMILE and LASEK for High Myopia: A 1-Year Outcome.

Refractive Outcome of Femtosecond Assisted Laser in situ Keratomileusis in 1564 cases of Myopia and Compound Myopic Astigmatism

Comparison of refractive outcomes and high-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism

Objective Optical Quality and Intraocular Scatter after LASIK: Femtosecond Laser Versus Mechanical Microkeratome

Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism

[Comparison of Laser in Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Myopia More Than -10.00 Diopters].