Abstract:Objective: To compare the visual quality between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in treating myopia and astigmatism. Methods: In this prospective non-randomized study, we selected 162 patients (324 eyes) with myopia and astigmatism who wanted refractive surgery in Changsha Aier Hospital from November, 2015 to February, 2016. The patients were allocated to either of two groups according to each person's request. The SMILE group had 78 patients (156 eyes) and the FS-LASIK group had 84 patients (168 eyes). All patients were followed up for 6 months. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and spherical equivalent (SE) were measured 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. Corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and decentration were measured 3 months after surgery. A vision quality questionnaire, based on a simplified version of Quality of Vision (QoV) Questionnaire to assess negative symptoms, was administered at 1 month and 6 months after surgery. Repeated measures ANOVA, ANOVA, chi-square test, and the rank-sum test were used to analyze and compare the data for the two groups. Results: One day after surgery, UCVA in the FS-LASIK group was better than in the SMILE group (t=4.555, P<0.001), but there were no significant differences between the two groups in the later periods. The SE in the SMILE group at 1 day after surgery were higher than in the FS-LASIK group (t=-2.952, P=0.003), but at 1 month and 6 months after surgery, there was no significant difference between them. HOA, spherical, coma, and trefoil aberrations were significantly increased in both groups at 3 months after surgery compared with the preoperative values (P<0.05). SMILE induced more spherical and trefoil aberrations compared with FS-LASIK (t=5.633, P<0.001; t=2.586, P=0.010). The cutting decentration with SMILE (0.17 ± 0.09 mm) was similar to FS-LASIK (0.18 ± 0.10 mm) (t=0.594, P=0.553). For SMILE patients, the rates and degrees of haloes at 6 months had declined compared with 1 month (χ2=5.547, P=0.019; Z=-2.283, P=0.022). For FS-LASIK patients, there were no significant changes in postoperative negative visual symptoms between 1 month and 6 months after surgery. There were also no significant differences between the two groups at 1 and 6 months. Conclusions: Vision recovery was slower with SMILE, and it induced more spherical and trefoil aberrations than FS-LASIK. Cutting decentration and the occurrence of negative visual symptoms were similar in both procedures. Key words: Keywords: small incision lenticule extraction; femtosecond laser; laser in situ keratomileusis; aberration; visual quality

Comparison of Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering after Femtosecond LASIK and Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lenses Implantation

A Comparative Study of the Effect of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery on Corneal Astigmatism in Post-LASIK Eyes and Virgin Eyes

Comparison of long-term outcomes between implantable collamer lens V4c and FS-LASIK for myopia correction with presbyopia

Objective Optical Quality and Intraocular Scatter after LASIK: Femtosecond Laser Versus Mechanical Microkeratome

Comparison of choroidal thickness in high myopic eyes after FS-LASIK versus implantable collamer lens implantation with swept-source optical coherence tomography

Comparison of objective visual quality between SMILE and FS-LASIK in moderate-to-high myopia

Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia

Contralateral Eye Comparison of the Long-Term Visual Quality and Stability Between Implantable Collamer Lens and Laser Refractive Surgery for Myopia

Optical quality after posterior chamber Phakic implantation of an intraocular Lens with a central hole (V4c implantable Collamer Lens) under different lighting conditions

Comparison of accommodation and accommodative micro-fluctuation after implantable collamer lens and LASIK surgery for myopia

Visual and Refractive Outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia

One-Year Visual Outcomes And Optical Quality Of Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction And Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (Icl V4c) Implantation For High Myopia

Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering after Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Comparison of Visual Quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK

Comparison of the Functional Optical Zone in Eyes with High Myopia with High Astigmatism after SMILE and FS-LASIK.

[Evaluations of extreme myopia correction with phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens and laser in situ keratomileusis].

Comparison of clinical results between trans-PRK and femtosecond LASIK for correction of high myopia

Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer: a one-year retrospective study

Comparison Of Objective And Subjective Visual Quality Early After Implantable Collamer Lens V4c (Icl V4c) And Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (Smile) For High Myopia Correction

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Higher-order Aberrations Between FS-LASIK and SMI-LIKE for Moderate to High Hyperopia: A 2-Year Result

Comparison of Posterior Corneal Elevation after SMILE and FS-LASIK in Correcting Myopia over −9.0 Diopters