Abstract:Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the functional optical zone (FOZ) after correction of high myopic astigmatism and low myopic astigmatism by small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods In this prospective study, 30 patients who received SMILE for high myopic astigmatism correction (cylinderical diopters ≤ − 2.0D) were enrolled in the high astigmatism group (HA). The control group comprised 40 patients who underwent SMILE for low myopic astigmatism correction (LA; cylinderical diopters ≥ − 0.5D). FOZ was delineated as the area outlined by a change of 0.5D relative to the power at the corneal vertex on the total corneal refractive power map. An ellipse-fitting program (MatLab) was used to calculate some parameters of the FOZ. Visual quality evaluations were also conducted, including evaluations of wavefront aberrations, optical quality, and intraocular scattering, and completion of a quality of life questionnaire. All of the right eyes were analyzed in the study. Results The preoperative average treatment spherical equivalent (− 5.77 ± 1.86D vs. − 6.49 ± 1.49D; P = 0.074), lenticule thickness (120.87 ± 23.27 μm vs. 118.53 ± 21.66 μm; P = 0.666), and programmed optical zone (6.58 ± 0.17 mm vs. 6.65 ± 0.18 mm; P = 0.104) were comparable between the HA and LA groups. The long axes (6.99 ± 1.14 mm vs. 5.32 ± 0.61 mm; P < 0.001), short axes (4.66 ± 0.96 mm vs. 4.23 ± 0.64 mm; P = 0.047), and area (25.90 ± 8.03 mm 2 vs. 17.92 ± 4.36 mm 2 ; P < 0.001) of the FOZ were significantly larger in the HA group than in the LA group. The centration of the FOZ were comparable between the two groups (0.62 ± 0.25 mm vs. 0.70 ± 0.25 mm; P = 0.194). Postoperative spherical aberration was lower in the HA group than in the LA group (0.07 ± 0.05 μm vs. 0.14 ± 0.10 μm; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the ocular scatter index (0.80 ± 0.46 vs. 0.73 ± 0.46; P = 0.447), modulated transfer function (MTF) cutoff (37.89 ± 9.79 cpd vs. 39.78 ± 7.45 cpd; P = 0.363), and Strehl in two dimensions (Strehl2D) ratio (0.20 ± 0.04 vs. 0.20 ± 0.04; P = 0.363) between the HA group and the LA group. There were no significant differences in the scores on quality of life between the HA and LA groups (45.88 ± 2.15 vs. 45.64 ± 1.84; P = 0.423). Correlation analysis revealed that increase in the spherical aberration was significantly correlated with the long axes, short axes and area in the FOZ in both groups. Conclusion With a comparable optical design and attempted correction in SMILE, the eyes with higher myopic astigmatism correction achieved larger FOZ than the eyes with lower myopic astigmatism correction. Consequently, less spherical aberration induction was created after higher myopic astigmatism correction. This result may be associated with less corneal volume sculpted by laser for the higher astigmatism treatment, leading to fewer biochemical responses and les change in corneal aspherity. Good retinal image quality and satisfied quality of life were achieved at a comparable level in both study groups.

Comparison of the Functional Optical Zone in Eyes with High Myopia with High Astigmatism after SMILE and FS-LASIK.

Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of Functional Optical Zone, and Visual Quality After SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia

Functional optical zone and visual quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK treatment for high myopia

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis in Patients with Deep Corneal Opacity: Case Series.

Effective Optical Zone and Centration Following SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia Calculated With a Novel Method

Comparison of long-term changes in the effective optical zone following SMILE and FS-LASIK for moderate and high myopia

Functional Optical Zone and Visual Quality After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for High Myopic Astigmatism

Comparison of Efficacy and Visual Outcomes after SMILE and FS-LASIK for the Correction of High Myopia with the Sum of Myopia and Astigmatism from -10.00 to -14.00 Dioptres.

Visual Outcomes after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for High Myopia.

Comparison of objective visual quality between SMILE and FS-LASIK in moderate-to-high myopia

Comparison of Optical Zone Decentration Following FS-LIKE and SMI-LIKE for Correcting Hyperopia

Achieved and Functional Optical Zone in Myopic Eyes with High Astigmatism after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Comparison of Posterior Corneal Elevation after SMILE and FS-LASIK in Correcting Myopia over −9.0 Diopters

A comparative and prospective study of corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK performed on the contralateral eyes of high myopia patients

Refractive Outcomes Comparing Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction And Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis For High Myopia

Comparison of myopic astigmatic correction after cross-assisted SMILE, FS-LASIK, and transPRK

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Higher-order Aberrations Between FS-LASIK and SMI-LIKE for Moderate to High Hyperopia: A 2-Year Result

Comparison of the Visual Results after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia.

Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer: a one-year retrospective study

Early visual function outcomes of topography-guided FS-LASIK and SMILE in treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism

Comparison of higher-order aberration changes in anterior corneal surface between FS-LASIK and SMILE surgery