Abstract:OBJECTIVETo assess and compare the accuracy and regularity and short-term change of corneal flap in different flap preparation styles.METHODSEighty eyes of 40 cases were treated with laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. One hundred and fifty-five eyes of 78 cases were treated with laser in situ keratomileusis with 90 microm microkeratome flap preparation and eighty-two eyes of 42 cases were treated with laser in situ keratomileusis with 100 microm femtosecond laser flap preparation. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was used to assess the thickness of epithelial or stromal flaps created with M2 microkeratome or VisuMax femtosecond laser by the same investigator 1 hour, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, respectively. The thickness of twenty-five measuring points across each flap in LASIK, which were 1.5 mm, 2.5 mm and 3.5 mm away from vertex of cornea on the horizontal, vertical, 45 degrees and 135 degrees meridian respectively and the vertex of cornea itself, was evaluated. The results were analyzed with t-test or ANOVA by SPSS software.RESULTSThe thickness of epithelial flaps was (57.91 + or - 6.76), (54.94 + or - 4.65), (54.96 + or - 2.70), (55.26 + or - 4.27) and (53.86 + or - 5.56) microm at 1 hour, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months respectively, with statistical significant difference between 1 hour and the other time points (F = 20.25, P < 0.05). The average thickness of stromal flaps on the vertex of cornea in microkeratome group was (129.16 + or - 12.10) microm, while (112.69 + or - 5.12) microm in the femtosecond laser group, which means the accuracy of flap preparation with femtosecond laser is better than with microkeratome. The absolute difference between actual and average thickness was (13.16 + or - 4.78) and (5.26 + or - 1.21) microm in the microkeratome group and femtosecond laser group, which means the reproducibility of flap preparation with femtosecond laser is better than with microkeratome as well. Flap morphology showed the feature of thin central area and thick peripheral area in microkeratome flap and uniformity in femtosecond laser flap, which illustrated the better regularity of femtosecond laser flap preparation.CONCLUSIONSAnterior segment optical coherence tomography is a safe, quick and reliable facility to examine and assess flap morphology. Our results showed the accuracy and regularity of femtosecond laser flap preparation outweighed microkeratome flap preparation.

Comparison of corneal flap morphology using AS-OCT in LASIK with the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.

Comparison of corneal flap morphology in laser in situ keratomileusis with the WaveLight femtosecond laser versus the Moria mechanical microkeratome

Evaluation of Morphological Features: Femtosecond-Lasik Flap Vs. SMILE Cap, and the Effects on Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations.

[Analysis of Flap Thickness by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Different Flap Preparation Styles of Excimer Laser Surgery].

AS-OCT as a tool for flap thickness measurement after femtosecond-assisted LASIK

Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement of Flap Thickness after Myopic LASIK Using the Moria One Use-Plus Microkeratome

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome: a retrospective comparison of visual outcomes at 3 months

Predictability of corneal flap in laser in situ keratomileusis with disposable M2 130 and 90 microkeratome heads

Effect of Flap Thickness on Higher Order Wavefront Aberrations Induced by LASIK: a Bilateral Study.

Comparison of corneaI biomechanicaI changes at earIy stage after femtosecond LASIK and microkeratome LASIK

Bilateral Comparison of Conventional Versus Topographic-guided Customized Ablation for Myopic LASIK with the NIDEK EC-5000

Comparison of Corneal Deformation Parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK.

Comparison of Corneal Sensation Between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (smile) and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Lasik for Myopia

A clinical evaluation of "Y-flap" laser epithelial keratomileusis

Comparison of clinical outcomes of a corneal wavefront- and topography-guided platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis on virgin eyes: an expanded cohort study

Evolution of corneal thickness and optical density after laser in situ keratomileusis versus small incision lenticule extraction for myopia correction

Comparison on biomechanical stability between femtosecond laser assisted LASIK and LASEK with ocular response analyzer

Comparison of Wavefront-Optimized Ablation and Topography-Guided Contoura Ablation With LYRA Protocol in LASIK

Thin flap is the tendency of laser in situ keratomileusis

LASIK flap thickness profile and reproducibility of the standard vs zero compression Hansatome microkeratomes: three-dimensional display with Artemis VHF digital ultrasound

[Clinical Analysis of Complications of LASIK Using the WaveLight FS200 Femtosecond Laser].