Abstract:OBJECTIVETo assess and compare the accuracy and regularity and short-term change of corneal flap in different flap preparation styles.METHODSEighty eyes of 40 cases were treated with laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. One hundred and fifty-five eyes of 78 cases were treated with laser in situ keratomileusis with 90 microm microkeratome flap preparation and eighty-two eyes of 42 cases were treated with laser in situ keratomileusis with 100 microm femtosecond laser flap preparation. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was used to assess the thickness of epithelial or stromal flaps created with M2 microkeratome or VisuMax femtosecond laser by the same investigator 1 hour, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, respectively. The thickness of twenty-five measuring points across each flap in LASIK, which were 1.5 mm, 2.5 mm and 3.5 mm away from vertex of cornea on the horizontal, vertical, 45 degrees and 135 degrees meridian respectively and the vertex of cornea itself, was evaluated. The results were analyzed with t-test or ANOVA by SPSS software.RESULTSThe thickness of epithelial flaps was (57.91 + or - 6.76), (54.94 + or - 4.65), (54.96 + or - 2.70), (55.26 + or - 4.27) and (53.86 + or - 5.56) microm at 1 hour, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months respectively, with statistical significant difference between 1 hour and the other time points (F = 20.25, P < 0.05). The average thickness of stromal flaps on the vertex of cornea in microkeratome group was (129.16 + or - 12.10) microm, while (112.69 + or - 5.12) microm in the femtosecond laser group, which means the accuracy of flap preparation with femtosecond laser is better than with microkeratome. The absolute difference between actual and average thickness was (13.16 + or - 4.78) and (5.26 + or - 1.21) microm in the microkeratome group and femtosecond laser group, which means the reproducibility of flap preparation with femtosecond laser is better than with microkeratome as well. Flap morphology showed the feature of thin central area and thick peripheral area in microkeratome flap and uniformity in femtosecond laser flap, which illustrated the better regularity of femtosecond laser flap preparation.CONCLUSIONSAnterior segment optical coherence tomography is a safe, quick and reliable facility to examine and assess flap morphology. Our results showed the accuracy and regularity of femtosecond laser flap preparation outweighed microkeratome flap preparation.

LASIK flap thickness profile and reproducibility of the standard vs zero compression Hansatome microkeratomes: three-dimensional display with Artemis VHF digital ultrasound

Evaluation of Morphological Features: Femtosecond-Lasik Flap Vs. SMILE Cap, and the Effects on Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations.

[Analysis of Flap Thickness by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Different Flap Preparation Styles of Excimer Laser Surgery].

Comparison of corneal flap morphology using AS-OCT in LASIK with the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.

Effect of Flap Thickness on Higher Order Wavefront Aberrations Induced by LASIK: a Bilateral Study.

AS-OCT as a tool for flap thickness measurement after femtosecond-assisted LASIK

Comparison of corneal flap morphology in laser in situ keratomileusis with the WaveLight femtosecond laser versus the Moria mechanical microkeratome

Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement of Flap Thickness after Myopic LASIK Using the Moria One Use-Plus Microkeratome

Predictability of corneal flap in laser in situ keratomileusis with disposable M2 130 and 90 microkeratome heads

Experimental evaluation of two current-generation automated microkeratomes: the Hansatome and the Supratome

Predictability of Ultra-Thin Corneal Flap Thickness Created with VisuMax Femtosecond Laser in High Myopia

The Impact Of Flap Creation Methods For Sub-Bowman'S Keratomileusis (Sbk) On The Central Thickness Of Bowman'S Layer

[The Effect of the Flap Thickness on Forward Shift of Posterior Corneal Surface in Excimer Laser Surgery Correcting High Myopia].

Nominal and achieved stromal ablation depth after myopic transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: implications for residual stromal thickness calculation

Differences in the early biomechanical effects of hyperopic and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis

Evaluation of the Difference Between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.

Bilateral Comparison of Conventional Versus Topographic-guided Customized Ablation for Myopic LASIK with the NIDEK EC-5000

Effect of Anterior Corneal Higher-Order Aberration Ablation Depth on Primary Topography-Guided LASIK Outcomes

Evolution of corneal thickness and optical density after laser in situ keratomileusis versus small incision lenticule extraction for myopia correction

Ocular Aberrations and Corneal Thickness-Intraocular Pressure Relationship One Year after Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Enhancement with An Aspheric Ablation Profile

Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK.