Abstract:We read with interest the article by Joo and Kim1 describing 2 patients with corneal perforation during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Bleeding from the flap margins resulting in prolonged exposure of the stromal bed and causing excessive dehydration is presumed to be the cause of the perforation in the first patient. We agree with the authors that it is vital to minimize the time interval between lifting the flap and performing laser ablation to obtain predictable results.2 If bleeding is noted after the flap is created, we suggest that it is best tackled with the flap in place. Pressure on the limbal vessels with a Merocel® sponge will result in cessation of the oozing within a few minutes. If the bleeding is more brisk, the speculum can be removed and the procedure postponed until it stops. Lifting the flap when there is active bleeding results in deposition of blood products in the interface, and the contracting fibrin can sometimes cause the flap to fold on itself. Opening up such a flap can result in flap edema from excessive handling and, consequently, poor adhesion to the underlying stromal bed. A drop of phenylephrine 2.5% can also be instilled to reduce the bleeding but can cause pupillary dilation and difficulty in ablation centration. Since the introduction of LASIK by Pallikaris et al. in 1990,3 the technique has not been perfected and new problems are being reported; e.g., the recent documentation of delayed-onset posterior keratectasia.4 There are surgeons who perform LASIK in which the residual stroma is much less than 250 μm, such as Case 2 of this report in which only 175 μm were left. We think this should be the exception rather than the rule. While we are waiting for a consensus on the safety limit of residual corneal bed thickness and the surgical algorithms for such, we agree with the general recommendation that 250 μm to 300 μm of residual posterior stroma be left untouched to ensure adequate biochemical corneal strength.5 In cases in which the cornea is thin relative to the treatment required, alternative ablation profiles such as multizone ablation6 and degressive profile that can increase ablation effectiveness can be considered. An adequate ablation diameter has to be kept to reduce the risk of a substantial drop in postoperative visual quality. Most surgeons agree that the ideal flap thickness is between 130 and 160 μm.7 The great variability of flap thickness produced by the manual SCMD microkeratome is of great concern. According to the manufacturer, the microkeratome was designed for a corneal flap thickness of 150 μm with a 10% range of error. The corneal thickness in the first case was 490 μm and the stromal bed thickness was 385 μm after the corneal flap was formed, indicating a flap thickness of only 105 μm. A recent study8 has shown that the mean flap thickness was 13 μm thinner than expected with the SCMD manual microkeratome. Moreover, the range of flap thickness was very wide, from 67.5 to 234 μm. This will have a great implication, especially when a thick corneal flap is produced in a thin cornea. In view of the great variability in the flap thickness, we suggest that intraoperative pachymetry be performed after flap formation, at least in selected cases. Finally, in patients having LASIK retreatment, global corneal pachymetry with instruments such as the Orbscan would help the surgeon identify variations in central corneal thickness. Knowledge of these areas of increased corneal thinning can aid in proper surgical planning. Victoria W.Y. Wong MBBS Christopher C. Zhu MD Srinivas K. Rao DO Dennis S.C. Lam FRCS, FRCOphth Hong Kong, China

Accuracy of corneal flap thickness made with Moria M2 90 disposable microkeratome in laser in situ keratom-ileusis

Comparison of corneal flap morphology in laser in situ keratomileusis with the WaveLight femtosecond laser versus the Moria mechanical microkeratome

A Morphological Study of Corneal Flap after Thin-Flap Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

Predictability of corneal flap in laser in situ keratomileusis with disposable M2 130 and 90 microkeratome heads

Evaluation of Morphological Features: Femtosecond-Lasik Flap Vs. SMILE Cap, and the Effects on Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations.

Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement of Flap Thickness after Myopic LASIK Using the Moria One Use-Plus Microkeratome

Comparison of corneal flap morphology using AS-OCT in LASIK with the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.

Thickness of the cornea and the corneal flap in Laser In Situ Keratomileusis measured by an ultrasound

Obversation of cornea flaps' characters created by Wavelight FS200 and Moria M2 110

[Analysis of Flap Thickness by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Different Flap Preparation Styles of Excimer Laser Surgery].

Measurement and Comparison of Corneal Flap Thickness Between Wavelight FS200 Femtosecond Laser and Moria 90 Microkeratome LASIK by OCT

Corneal Flap Morphological Analysis Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis with Femtosecond Lasers Versus Mechanical Microkeratome

Comparison between two types of microkeratomes in LASIK

Corneal flap thickness on visual quality after LASIK

Corneal Perforation During Laser in Situ Keratomileusis

Corneal aberrations and visual performance after flap creation of LASIK with a femtosecond laser and a mechanical microkeratome

Predictability of Ultra-Thin Corneal Flap Thickness Created with VisuMax Femtosecond Laser in High Myopia

Comparison Study of Flap Thickness Created with Femtosecond-LASIK and SBK

Relationship between preoperative keratometry and corneal flap diameter and thickness in LASIK

[A clinical study of actual corneal ablation depth in laser in situ keratomileusis]

Clinical research of KM-5000D automatic microkeratome for making corneal flap in LASIK