Abstract:Abstract Principles form part and parcel of our law and legal discourse, so much so that we seldom think of what they are and what they entail. For centuries they have been invoked daily to interpret and argue about the law. But when it comes to matters of constitutional law, principles are further called upon to perform a perennially controversial function: to help police the boundaries of state action. In most common law jurisdictions with a written constitution, this function of principles runs against the generally accepted view that the exercise of judicial review must ultimately be governed and restricted by the terms of the national constitution. This Article argues that the exercise of judicial review based on principles is not confined to that view, once the relationship between principles and the constitution is unpacked and recontextualized. While the English-language literature on principles over the past half-century has been dominated by a select group of Anglo-American scholars, there is a wealth of untapped insights from other parts of the world. One of the major contributions by continental legal theorists even predates the earliest modern Anglo-American writings on the subject by more than a decade. Overall, the law literature in common law and civil law systems reveals a significant degree of commonalities in the basic characters of principles despite the absence of initial evidence of transsystemic borrowings. The wider conceptual inquiry also displays a shift in the focus of the debate, from the protracted search for a clear-cut distinction between rules and principles towards a redefinition of principles’ relationship with “written” law, be it in the form of a civil code or a constitutional instrument. From this inquiry reemerge “unwritten” principles not deriving from codified or legislated law although they have been used to develop the law. Translated into the constitutional domain, these unwritten principles bear no logical connection with the terms of the constitution. Their main functions cover the entire spectrum from serving as interpretive aids to making law by filling gaps. The theoretical framework fits with an ongoing four-century-old narrative of the evolution of constitutional principles and judicial review across most common law-based systems. Constitutional principles are another area where Anglo-American law and legal discourse is less exceptional and more universal than what many assume. Throughout modern Western history, legal battles have been fought and ensuing developments have been made on the grounds of principles. Our law and jurisprudence remain based on them.

The Principle That Men Are All Equal Before Criminal Law: A Philosophical Interpretation of Article 4 of the Criminal Act

On the Basic Principles in Civil Laws and Their Relations

The Analysis Of the Importance of the Affirming of the Principle of Equal Protection by"Property Law"

On the Establishment of the Principle of Public Order and Good Morals

On the System of the Fundamental Principles to Be Provided for in the Civil Code of P. R. China

Equality As the Supreme Justice

On the Principle of Objective and Considerate Obligation

On the Legislative Expressions of Basic Principles in Civil Law

Legal Principles, Constitutional Principles, and Judicial Review

The Law and Critical Discourse Studies

The Contact Point and Difference between the Principle of Prohibition of Excessively Abundant Restriction and the Principle of Prohibition of Excessively Deficient Protection as Constitutional Principles

THE PRINCIPLE OF PROTECTION OF HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

On the Establishment of the Principle of Individual Criminal Responsibility in the International Criminal Law

On the Relativity of the Purpose of Criminal Law

On the question of the role of the principle of justice in the system of principles of criminal punishment

Philosophical Retrospection on the Issue of Equality

The Principle of Integrating Subjectivity and Objectivity:Examination from both Deontology and Methodology

Reciprocity: Generating Principle of Justice

Justice as the determining principle of criminal law

The Principle of Philosophy of Law in the Unification of Morality and Law

Comment on Jurisprudence Basis of Equal Protection for Legal Property of Real Law