Abstract:The constitutive elements of a crime are stipulated by the provisions of criminal law.At this point,there is no difference between the four—element constitutive theory and the three —tier criminal system.The sole difference lying between the two theories is whether there is any ranking relationship among the constitutive elements of a crime.The ranking nature of various elements refers that the prior element should not be established after the existence of the posterior one but should act as the prerequisite of the posterior one,thus forms the progressive logical relationship between various elements of a crime.In the three—tier criminal system,the ranking relationship exists in the three tiers of Tatbestandmaessigkeit,Rechtswidrigkeit and Schuld. The three tiers of criminal system correspond to three principles and embody the protection of three kinds of value respectively.Tatbestandmaessigkeit corresponds to the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a special crime,thus safeguards human rights.Rechtswidrigkeit corresponds to the principle of protecting legal interests,and incarnates the value of criminal law to protect the society.And the tier of schuld corresponds to the doctrine of responsibility,and accords with the ethnic or equal value of criminal law.Meanwhile,the ranking relationship among the three tiers functions as the logical guide in the course of conviction in judicature and can ensure its correction.Thus the three—tier criminal system is with scientific nature and should be adopted in China. However,under the four—element constitutive theory,there exists no ranking relationship among the object,objective aspects,subject and subjective aspects of a crime,but only a sort of order which can be changed freely.As for their logical relationship,the four elements are in an interdependent relationship.When determining cases according to the four—element theory,the order from objective judgments to subjective ones is reversed from time to time,and the fact judgments are sometimes confused with the value ones,which would cause practical defects and affect the corrective conviction eventually.

The Principle of Integrating Subjectivity and Objectivity:Examination from both Deontology and Methodology

Legal Realism and Criminal Justice in Transitional Society

On the Principle of Objective and Considerate Obligation

Theory of Criminal Constitutive Elements:Relationship Confusion and Conquer

On the question of the role of the principle of justice in the system of principles of criminal punishment

On the Theory of Objective Imputation and the Judicial Practice in China

From Attribution to Zurechnung:The Study of the Theory of Objektive Zurechnung

On the Relativity of the Purpose of Criminal Law

Research on the Mechanism of Unreasonable Objective Attribution

Justice as the determining principle of criminal law

Systematic Position of Objective Imputation

The Framework of Doctrines of Criminalization Based on Violation and Culpability

Some Fundamental Issues in the Theory of the Legal Method of Criminal law

Weighing and balancing of principles in cases with rule paradoxes

Conceptual Analysis of Legal Behavior, Civil Behavior and Civil Law Behavior--Inspiration on the Compilation of General Provisions of Civil Law

Transformation of the Discourse on the Function of Criminal Law

Study on Criminal Jurisprudence: Western Countries' Experience and China's Reality

Ranking Nature of Criminal System

Methodology of Criminal Jurisprudence

Chinese Structure for Analyzing Criminal Liability in Transitional Period

The Practice on Criminal Integration