Abstract:In the theory of four—element crime constitution,there is no room for the objective punishment condition.But the objective punishable condition already exists in the criminal legislation of our country now.How to understand and apply these provisions is an issue that cannot be avoided in theory. The general view in the foreign countries is that the objective punishable conditions do not require the actor's cognition and foresight.However,regarding the objective punishable condition in general is suspected of oversimplifying the problem.According to substantial connection between some certain condition and illegality,the objective punishable condition can be divided into the internal and external condition two types,if we insist on the hierarchical constituents of crime theory .The most worthy of discussing is the internal objective punishable condition.It is in the "extended line" of behavior which increases the risk of infringing the interest in law when intervening factors appear.Although it is different from typical illegal element,it can produce illegal effect. Actor just needs to know the possibility of internal objective punishment condition.To the contrary, external objective punishment condition belongs to the category of criminal punishment,has no effect on the illegality and responsibility,and does not require the cognition and foresight of actors. The research of internal objective punishment condition is of great significance to understand and apply some provisions in our criminal legislation.There is necessity for the internal objective punishment condition to exist in the present stage.To put it further,recognizing this concept is in consideration of the doctrines of legally prescribed punishment for special crime and legal interest protection.If we recognize this concept,there is no need to advocate the concept of "objective surpassing elements".The problems regarded under the name of objective surpassing elements can be analyzed according to the approach of internal objective punishment conditions.

On the Principle of Objective and Considerate Obligation

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

On Objective Responsibility of Prosecutors

A Comparative Study of the Application of the Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion in Japan,Germany and China

The Principle of Integrating Subjectivity and Objectivity:Examination from both Deontology and Methodology

Fundamental Questions about Responsibility

On the question of the role of the principle of justice in the system of principles of criminal punishment

On the Application and Perfection of the Presumption of Innocence Principle in China

The Criminal Policy under the Circumstance of the Contemporary Rule of Law

On the Principle of Superior Responsibility in the International Criminal Law

On the Establishment of the Principle of Individual Criminal Responsibility in the International Criminal Law

Internal Objective Punishment Condition

On the Establishment of the Principle of Public Order and Good Morals

Re-thinking of Principle of No Punishment in Doubtful Cases

Views on Conducting Civil Proceedings by Procuratorial Institutions

The Basic Logic of Constructing Legal Procedures

Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

Several Issues on the Reform of Criminal Procedure

On the Relativity of the Purpose of Criminal Law

THE PRINCIPLE OF PROTECTION OF HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS