Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

Public Opinions on Criminal Trials in China: A Comparative Study of Chinese College Students in the PRC and Hong Kong

Legal Research Methodology and the Modernization of Criminal Procedure——The Illustration of Legal Research Methodology of Law and Economics

Legal Realism and Criminal Justice in Transitional Society

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years

Study on Criminal Jurisprudence: Western Countries' Experience and China's Reality

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

Reflection on the Mode of Research on the Science of Criminal Procedure

Several Issues on the Reform of Criminal Procedure

Discussion on Research Methodology of Law of Evidence.

Discussion on the Application and Improvement of Criminal Trial by Default in China

Criminal Methodology and Judicial Logic

A Preliminary Research on Failure of Criminal Procedure

Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

The Basic Logic of Constructing Legal Procedures

Improving the Full Review of the Criminal Trial of Second Instance

Criminal Law Research:Resuscitation at the Eve of Dying