Abstract:At present stage, the transmittance improvement is still a thorny problem in SiAlON ceramics due to their complex composition and processing. In the present research, Dy–α-SiAlON ceramics were selected to be translucent in the medium infrared range. The samples had a higher densification value by using hot-pressing (HP) sintering method at 1650–1700 °C with or without LiF additive. The as-sintered specimens experienced the post-hot-isostatic-pressing (PHIP) treatment at 1650–1700 °C for 30–90 min in either N 2 or Ar environment to increase the optical transmittance. A significant optical transparency improvement has been found in Dy–α-SiAlON, with or without LiF co-doping, undergone a PHIP at 1700 °C for 30 min under an Argon gas pressure of 180 MPa. The improved transmittance attributes to a fully developed α-Sialon crystalline phase, a uniform grain size, a denser grain arrangement, and a clean grain boundary, based on the X-ray diffraction analysis, SEM and TEM microstructure observation, and optical transmittance measurement. Keywords Dy–α-SiAlON Hot pressing sintering Post hot-isostatic-pressing treatment Transmittance Infrared range 1 Introduction SiAlONs, as the solid solution of Si 3 N 4 with the substitution of Al and O for Si and N, are well-developed advanced engineering ceramic materials for their excellent combination of mechanical strength, toughness, hardness and thermal shock resistance. And it has also been interesting in the controllable properties of SiAlON's by chemical composition design and processing adjusting. In recent twenty years, the translucent SiAlONs attracted considerable attention for their potential applications as optical window or dome materials in a wide range from visible to medium infrared wavelengths, facing an increased requirement for some applications in the extreme harsh environment, for example, under higher temperature or supersonic working conditions. Many material scientists have successfully prepared different translucent SiAlONs with varied element doping or substitution of Al and O for Si and N. In 1981, Mitomo with his colleagues reported a translucent β-SiAlON using the hot-pressing sintering technique, with a composition of z = 2–4, but the transmittance was not very high in the infrared region. 1 Later, Karunaratne reported that Y 3+ -doped SiAlON could be optical translucent ceramics, just using a pressureless sintering method. 2 In the following years, a serial colorful and translucent SiAlONs were obtained by a wider selection of elements doping from alkali earth cations Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ to many rear earth cations, where most of the prepared ceramics were α-SiAlONs. In 1997, Shen's group designed and sintered a series of Nd3 + , Tb 3+ , Er 3+ , Sm 3+ , and Y 3+ -doped translucent SiAlONs by hot-pressing method. 3 Then, Mandal's group reported the single-phase α-SiAlONs with a wider optical transmission range by hot-isostatic-pressing sintering. 4 Jones with his colleagues prepared Lu–α-SiAlONs with a higher transmission of 70% in the visible region and a dual phase mixture of α/β-SiAlONs having a higher toughness, in 2003 and 2004 respectively. 5,6 Su and Chen shown us some good results of higher transmission in the infrared range of 3–5 μm obtained in Dy–SiAlON by spark plasma sintering and Gd–SiAlON by hot pressing method in 2004 and 2005. 7,8 Recently, Xiong's group published their research work on the translucent Mg–SiAlON using spark plasma sintering. 9 In the same year, Xue of our group reported the lower temperature sintering of translucent Dy–SiAlON with LiF as additive. 10 Furthermore, Ye with his group published their new results about Y 3+ /Yb 3+ dual-doped α-SiAlONs having a higher infrared transmission and toughened Sc 3+ /Lu 3+ doped α-SiAlONs by an in situ growth of elongated grains in 2008 and 2009 respectively. 11,12 Now it is clear that a higher optical transmission, without a bigger victim of mechanical properties, is the aim that all SiAlONs researchers pursued for. Therefore many efforts have been made to reach the aim by accurately adjusting of chemical composition and purity, and using post-heat-treatment. While the post-heat-treatment after sintering process was considered to be effective to increase transmission by increasing the uniformity of grain size, minimizing the pores in the bulks, and reducing the amounts of residual glassy phase or grain boundary phase. It is the microstructural inhomogeneity (pores, grain boundary, anisotropy of grains, etc.) in the polycrystalline ceramics that causes the internal light scattering with a resultant of optical opaque. Among the post-heat treatment techniques, the hot-isostatic-pressing (HIP) or post-hot-isostatic pressing (PHIP) were proved to be an important way to further densify the powder compacts, then to provide the improvement of mechanical and optical properties. Ekstrom et al. reported the Yttrium-doped α-SiAlON HIP-ed and PHIP-ed with less residual grain boundary glass phases. 13 It was the reduced residual grain boundary glass phases that played a positive role in raising the optical transmittance of materials. Motivated by the research activities mentioned above, in the present study, hot-pressing sintering (HP) and post-hot-isostatic-pressing technique were combined to fabricate and enhance the Dy–α-SiAlONs with a higher transmission in medium infrared region of 3–5 μm, because Dy–α-SiAlONs are excellent candidates for optical window materials, not only for their stability of crystal phase but also for the economical consideration. 2 Experimental According to the phase equilibrium relationship of the complex SiAlONs and the formula of M m / v Si 12−( m + n ) Al m + n O n N 16− n , the α-SiAlON ceramics reported here has a nominal composition Dy 0.66 Si 9.0 Al 3.0 O 1.0 N 15.0 (noted as Dy–SiAlON, where M = Dy, m = 2 n = 2.0, v = 3). High-purity powders of α-Si 3 N 4 (SN-E10, Ube, Japan), AlN (Grade A, Starck, Germany), Dy 2 O 3 (Yaolong Chemical Plant, Shanghai, China), Al 2 O 3 (Yaolong Chemical Plant, Shanghai, China), and LiF (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) were mixed in ethanol, milled using Si 3 N 4 balls in a Si 3 N 4 jar. After milling, the powder slurry was dried at 80 °C and sieved. And then a charge of 6.0 g each was loaded directly into a graphite die of 25 mm in diameter. The samples were hot pressed at 1650–1700 °C under a 30 MPa pressure for 60 min in a flowing nitrogen atmosphere of 0.1 MPa. After HP sintering, the compacted samples were put into the HIP furnace for a further PHIP heat treatment at 1650–1700 °C for 30–90 min under a 120 MPa pressure of N 2 or a 180 MPa pressure of Ar atmosphere. The HP-sintered and PHIP-treated samples were sliced with the surface perpendicular to the hot-pressing direction, and then polished or thinned to different thickness for the microstructure observation and optical transmission measurement. Bulk density of specimens was measured by Archimedes principle. The phase analysis was performed using the X-ray diffractionmeter (D8, Advance X-ray Diffractionmeter, Bruker, Germany). Microstructure observation was carried out under an electron probe microanalyzer (JXA-8100, JEOL, Japan) and transmission electron microscope (JEM-2010/200CX/2100F, JEOL, Japan). Optical transmission of the translucent samples in wavelength of 2.5–6.5 μm was measured using a Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (EQUINOX55, Bruker, USA). 3 Results and discussion Table 1 lists the results obtained from all samples HP-sintered and PHIP-treated, in which it clearly shows the effects of temperature, soaking time, or atmosphere of PHIP treatment on phase purity and optical transmittance of the resultant bulks. Based on the previous researches by other scientists and ourselves, 10,14–16 additional and optimal 0.1 wt% LiF was added to reduce the HP-sintering temperature, decrease the grain size, and then increase the optical transmittance to some extent. LiF was considered to be an important sintering additive for preparing ceramics at lower temperatures by causing the formation of intermediate phase. Presumably, LiF “film”, or a film of complex composition formed by reaction with SiO 2 on Si 3 N 4 powders, or Al 2 O 3 on AlN powders, or grain boundary phases, could act as an “eutectic activated layer” or “pathway” through which an enhanced grain boundary sliding, or particle rearrangement, or interface diffusivity could occur, with an increasing sintering rate and grain growth. Comparatively, Dy–SiAlON without 0.1 wt% LiF additive should be sintered at a higher temperature level (1700 °C) to reach a full density. Therefore, there were no significant differences in grain size, morphology, grain boundary phases, and even density between LiF-doped and undoped Dy–SiAlON. Fig. 1 shows a HRTEM micrograph and EDAX analysis of the triple junction by three grains in the 0.1 wt%LiF–Dy–SiAlON HP-sintered at 1650 °C for 60 min in N 2 gas. The elemental analysis of the grain boundary phase indicates the complex composition of Dy–Si–Al–O–N with a trace of F existence. The XRD data for the series samples either HP-sintered or PHIP-treated ones showed that the crystalline phase in the HP-sintered bulks was primarily α-SiAlON with minor Dy–melilite solid solution Dy–melilite solid solution (Dy 2 Si 3− x Al x O 3+ x N 4− x , abbreviated as M′) or as main grain boundary phase, but the samples undergone a PHIP-treatment in N 2 atmosphere contained more Dy–mellilite solid solution phase. It is reasonable to consider the co-existence of α-SiAlON with Dy 2 Si 3− x Al x O 3+ x N 4− x phase, according to the subsolidus phase relationships in the systems R–Si–Al–O–N (R = Nd, Sm, Dy) and also the calculation results of multicomponent systems, 17,18 where R-melilite solid solution was thought to be the only stable compound which is compatible with α- or β-SiAlON in the complex system of R 2 O 3 –Si 3 N 4 –AlN–Al 2 O 3 . It should emphasize that the percentages of Dy–melilite solid solution increase gradually with the increase of temperature and Al substitute in a following N 2 atmosphere. In our present experiment, when PHIP-treated in N 2 atmosphere, the Dy–SiAlON experienced the second run of heating and soaking at higher temperature in a N 2 atmosphere. As a consequence, the solution–precipitation–recrystallization process might occur during the longer PHIP stage at the interface between Dy 2 Si 3− x Al x O 3+ x N 4− x and α-SiAlON phase. And more Dy 2 Si 3− x Al x O 3+ x N 4− x phase too could develop because its lower viscosity and higher mobility of reaction than those of Dy–SiAlON. The most striking feature in the experimental result was the big difference in optical transmittance between the HP-sintered and PHIP-treated samples. The HP-sintered ones, with or without LiF addition, were all translucent in a wide range from visible to medium infrared wavelength, seen in Fig. 2 , showing a translucent LiF–Dy–α-SiAlON sample after HP-sintered. Contrarily, the samples PHIP-treated in the N 2 atmosphere were all opaque, with more grain boundary phase contents contained, as mentioned above. The increased grain boundary phase was thought to be formed at the interface or triple junctions of grains under a higher PHIP temperature, a longer soaking time, but a rather lower N 2 pressure (120 MPa) condition. That might be related to a solution–precipitation–recrystallization process of SiAlON grains, reacted with grain boundary phase Dy–melilite solid solution during the PHIP step under a rather lower pressure of N 2 gas, since the PHIP-treatment was generally carried out under a much higher gas pressure than 180 MPa to restrict the “solution” of crystalline grains. Fig. 3 gives a strong evidence to support the explanation, which illustrates the surface micrograph of the sample Dy–SiAlON PHIP-treated at 1650 °C/90 min/N 2 (120 MPa), where it can be seen that the round α′ grains are surrounded by grain boundary phases, that is indentified to be the chemical composition rich in N and Si contents according to EDAX elemental analysis. And a heavier C contamination (about 5 wt%) was also detected in the same sample. Comparatively, the samples, that were PHIP-treated at much higher temperature of 1700 °C but in an inert Ar environment, showed a higher transmittance than that of the original HP-sintered ones. There was only a minor M′ phase existence in the PHIP-treated sample around an inert Ar gas, since a much higher inert gas pressure was very effective to restrict the “solution” of crystalline grains. The highest value of transmittance was obtained in the sample 0.1LiF-doped Dy–α-SiAlON experienced a PHIP history at 1700 °C/30 min/Ar (180 MPa) after HP-sintering at 1650 °C/60 min/N 2 . Fig. 3 shows the optical transmittance spectrum and a TEM micrograph of the investigated PHIP-ed (in Ar gas) sample, 0.1LiF-doped Dy–α-SiAlON with a thickness of 0.5 mm for transmittance measurement. The sample has a higher optical transmittance in the medium infrared region and the transmittance value is over 70%, possessing a maximum value of 73%. As a comparison, the maximum transmittance value of the original HP-ed 0.1LiF-doped Dy–α-SiAlON sample was only 62%. The specimen PHIP-treated at 1700 °C/30 min/Ar (180 MPa) was chosen for electron microscope observation to find some answers about the transparency improvement in the view of microstructure. The micrograph in Fig. 4 reveals a denser grains arrangement, an equiaxed grain morphology, and less grain boundary phases remaining at the interface or triple junctions in the PHIP-treated specimen. As expected, the PHIP treatment provided an important role in enhancing plastic yielding, creep, and diffusion of grains during the heating under a higher gas pressure applied. It is the denser grain arrangement and less grain boundary phases that attribute the transmittance improvement by reducing the light scattering from the inhomogeneous microstructure feature in the polycrystalline ceramics. As the parallel or reference experimental, the samples without additive of LiF were also investigated on their optical property and microstructure feature. The sample Dy–α-SiAlON needed to be HP-sintered at a higher temperature of 1700 °C owning less M′ grain boundary phase at interface or triple conjunctions of grain boundary. Therefore, the sample was also translucent in the visible and medium infrared region as well. The highest value of transmittance was obtained in the sample Dy–α-SiAlON experienced a post-HIP history at 1700 °C/30 min/Ar (180 MPa) after HP-sintering at 1700 °C/60 min/N 2 . Fig. 5 shows the optical transmittance spectrum and a micrograph of the investigated Dy–α-SiAlON sample, with a thickness of 1.0 mm for transmittance measurement. The sample has a higher optical transmittance in the medium infrared region and the transmittance value is over 60%, having a maximum value of 64%. As a comparison, the maximum transmittance value of the original HP-ed Dy–α-SiAlON sample was only 58%. Electron microscope observation shows no significant grain growth after experienced a PHIP step. Fig. 4 reveals a uniform grains size distribution in the PHIP-ed sample. Similarly, it is the well-grown grain size, denser grain arrangement, and less residual intergranular phases that result in the transmittance improvement in PHIP-ed Dy–α-SiAlON by weakening the light scattering from the inhomogeneous microstructure feature in the ceramics. 4 Conclusion Post-hot-isostatic-pressing (PHIP) treatment at a higher temperature (1700 °C) and under a higher inert Ar environment pressure (180 MPa) was an effective method for promoting the optical transparency of Dy–α-SiAlON with or without LiF additive, by supplying an extra driving force for sintering. The higher inert Ar gas pressure was very effective to restrict the “solution” of crystalline grains and the formation of grain boundary phase. Microstructure observation reveals that the uniform grain size with an equiaxed grain morphology, denser grain arrangement, and less grain boundary phases attribute the transmittance improvement of the Dy–α-SiAlON or LiF-doped Dy–α-SiAlON ceramics that experienced a PHIP processing in Ar environment. But the PHIP treatment under a rather lower N 2 pressure (120 MPa) showed a negative effect on the transparency increasing, by inducing a higher Dy–mellilite solid solution (M′) grain boundary phase content, resulting in a stronger light scattering. So, the further investigation on the gas pressure, gas type, and temperature of PHIP has to be considered to further promote the transparency of the SiAlONs ceramics. References 1 M. Mitomo T. Moriyoshi T. Sakai Y. Ohsaka M. Kobayasgi Translucent β-SiAlON Ceramics J Mater Sci Lett 1 1981 25 26 2 B.S.B. Karunaratne R.J. Lumby M.H. Lewis Rear-earth-doped α-SiAlON ceramics with novel optical properties J Mater Res 11 1996 2790 2794 3 Z.J. Shen M. Nygren U. Hslenius Absorption spectra of rare-earth-doped α-SiAlON ceramics J Mater Sci Lett 16 1997 263 266 4 H. Mandal New developments in α-SiAlON ceramics J Eur Ceram Soc 19 1999 2349 2357 5 M.I. Jones H. Hyuga K. Hirao Optical and mechanical properties of α/β-SiAlON composites J Am Ceram Soc 86 2003 520 522 6 M.I. Jones H. Hyuga K. Hyuga Y. Yamauch Highly translucent Lu–α-SiAlON J Am Ceram Soc 87 2004 714 716 7 X.L. Su P.L. Wang W.W. Chen Z.J. Shen M. Nygren Y.B. Cheng Effects of composition and thermal treatment on infrared transmission of Dy–α-SiAlON J Eur Ceram Soc 24 2004 2869 2877 8 W.W. Chen X.L. Su P.L. Wang D.S. Yan Optical properties of Gd–α-SiAlON ceramics: effect of carbon contamination J Am Ceram Soc 88 2005 2304 2306 9 Y. Xiong Z.Y. Fu H. Wang W.M. Wang J.Y. Zhang Q.J. Zhang Translucent Mg–α-SiAlON ceramics prepated by spark plasma sintering J Am Ceram Soc 90 2007 1647 1649 10 J.M. Xue Q. Liu L.H. Gui Lower-temperature hot-pressed Dy–α-SiAlON ceramics with LiF additive J Am Ceram Soc 90 2007 1623 1625 11 F. Ye L.M. Liu C.F. Liu H.J. Zhang Y. Zhou J. Yu High infrared transmission of Y 3+ –Yb 3+ -doped-α-SiAlON Mater Lett 62 2008 4535 4538 12 F. Ye C.F. Liu L.M. Liu Y. Zhou Optical properties on in-situ toughened ScLu–α-SiAlON Scipta Mater 61 2009 982 984 13 A. Bartek T. Ekstrom H. Herbertsson T. Johansson Yttrium α-SiAlON ceramics by hot isostatic pressing and post-hot isostatic pressing J Am Ceram Soc 75 1992 432 439 14 M.W. Benscke N.E. Olson J.A. Pask Effect of LiF on hot-pressing of MgO J Am Ceram Soc 50 1967 365 368 15 J.P. Guha H.U. Anderson Reaction during sintering of barium titanate with lithium fluoride J Am Ceram Soc 69 1986 C-193 C-194 16 K.W. White G.P. Kelkar Fracture mechanisms of a coarse-grained, transparent MgAl 2 O 4 at elevated temperatures J Am Ceram Soc 75 1992 3440 3444 17 W. Chen P. Wang D.S. Yan Study on the formation behavior and crystallography of N-containing melilite solid solutions Dy 2 Si 3− x Al x O 3+ x N 4− x (R = Nd, Sm, Dy, Y, Yb) Eur J Solid State Inorg Chem 34 1997 871 880 18 P. Dorner L.J. Gauckler H. Krieg H.L. Lucas G. Petzow J. Weiss On the calculation and representation of multicomponent systems Mater Today 3 1979 241 257

Abstract:Highlights ► In this study, the effect of MgO and SiO 2 on the optical properties of transparent ceramics was studied. ► High quality Nd:YAG ceramics with compound sintering aids obtained by vacuum sintering at 1780 °C are composed of grains of the size ∼10 μm, and their transmittance is 82% at 400 nm. ► It was found that the absorption coefficient of 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG ceramic is 8.6 cm −1 at 808 nm and its absorption cross section is 6.26 × 10 −20 cm 2 . Abstract Nd:YAG transparent ceramics were fabricated by a reactive sintering method under vacuum using SiO 2 , MgO and compound additives (SiO 2 and MgO) as sintering aids. The effects of SiO 2 and MgO on the microstructure and sintering process of Nd:YAG ceramics were studied. High quality Nd:YAG ceramics with compound sintering aids obtained by vacuum sintering at 1780 °C are composed of grains of the size ∼10 μm, and their transmittance is 82% at 400 nm. It was found the absorption coefficient of 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG ceramic was 8.6 cm −1 at 808 nm and its absorption cross section was calculated to be 6.26 × 10 −20 cm 2 . Keywords Nd:YAG Sintering aids SiO 2 MgO Ceramic 1 Introduction Neodymium doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) has proven to be one of the best solid-state laser materials in previous research due to their excellent physical, mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties [1,2] . Many recent works have shown that the lasing performance of transparent polycrystalline Nd:YAG ceramics is equivalent to or even better than that of Nd:YAG single crystals grown by the Czochralski method [3–5] . It is well known that SiO 2 can be used as the sintering aid to remove the microstructural heterogeneities such as pores and secondary phases to achieve fully dense and transparent Nd:YAG ceramics [6–8] . In addition to SiO 2 , MgO has also been proven as an effective sintering aid for the densification of Nd:YAG transparent ceramics [9] . However, there have been few reports on the effects of co-adding both SiO 2 and MgO as sintering aids in YAG or Nd:YAG transparent ceramics so far [10] . In this study, high quality Nd:YAG transparent ceramics were fabricated by a reactive sintering method under vacuum using both SiO 2 and MgO as the compound sintering aids. The morphologies and microstructure of the fabricated Nd:YAG transparent ceramics were investigated. The effect of MgO and SiO 2 on the optical properties of transparent ceramics was also studied. By using 0.1 wt.% MgO and 0.145 wt.% SiO 2 as the sintering aids, the fully transparent Nd:YAG ceramics with a good transparence are successfully fabricated. It was also found that co-doping MgO and SiO 2 could greatly enhance the densification rate. 2 Experimental procedures High-purity powders of α-Al 2 O 3 (99.99% purity, Shanghai Wusong Chemical Co., Ltd.), Y 2 O 3 (99.999% purity, Jiahua Advanced Material Resources Co., Ltd.) and Nd 2 O 3 (99.995% purity, Jiahua Advanced Material Resources Co., Ltd.) were used as the starting materials, which were all commercially available powders. Three compositions, A (Nd:YAG + SiO 2 ), B (Nd:YAG + SiO 2 + MgO), and C (Nd:YAG + MgO), were designed. The powders were blended together according to the stoichiometric ratio of 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG and were ball-milled with high-purity Al 2 O 3 ball in ethanol for 12 h. The mixtures of the powder were dried and sieved through a 200-mesh screen. After removing the organic components by calcining at 800 °C for 3 h, the powders were pressed into pellets in a stainless steel die at the pressure around 15 MPa. The green body was further followed by cold-isostatically pressed at 200 MPa. The compacted pellets were sintered under vacuum at the vacuum level better than 10 −3 Pa in a furnace equipped with tungsten meshes as the heating elements. After that, the pellets were annealed at 1450 °C for 10 h in air and mirror polished on both surfaces with different grade of the diamond slurries. The phase composition of the specimens was identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Model D5005, Siemens, Germany). The microstructure of the transparent ceramics were checked with the scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6360LV, JEOM, Tokyo, Japan). The optical transmittance of transparent ceramics were measured by a UV–VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (Model Cary-5000, VARIAN, Australia). The kinetics of densification for the Nd:YAG ceramics were examined by a dilatometric equipment (Thermal Mechanical Analyzer, TMA, setsys 16/18, Setaram, France). The emission spectrum of the samples was measured at room temperature by a spectrofluorometer (Fluorolog-3, Jobin Yvon, France), with an 808 nm diode laser as the excitation source. 3 Results and discussion A large number of the previous literatures discussed the phase evolution during sintering [8,11] . Generally, it is hard to get pure YAG phase from the direct reaction of the commercial Y 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 powders during the sintering. The intermediate phases such as Y 4 Al 2 O 9 (YAM) and YAlO 3 (YAP) are commonly found during the reaction. At the temperature higher than 1400 °C, the YAG phase starts to form. In this study, a similar reaction sequence was observed. Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of Nd:YAG transparent ceramics sintered at 1780 °C. All the peaks for the samples A–C can be well indexed to the cubic garnet structure of YAG. This indicated that the full transformation to YAG occurred during the vacuum sintering. The transmittance of Nd:YAG samples with different sintering aids is shown in Fig. 2 . Obviously, the sample B with compounds MgO and SiO 2 as the sintering aids achieved better transmittance than that of the samples A and C only with SiO 2 or MgO as the single sintering aid. The maximum transmittance was 76.9%, 83.8% and 48.2% for the samples A–C at 1064 nm, respectively. It could be seen that the transmittance of sample A decreased sharply with the decrease in the wavelength, especially in the wavelength ranging from 500 to 300 nm. Compared with sample A without MgO as the sintering aid, the transmittance of samples B and C with the presence of MgO decreased less in the region from 1100 to 400 nm. Currently, most of YAG transparent ceramics were fabricated by using SiO 2 as the single sintering aid. However, in this study, high optical quality YAG ceramic was not achieved by only using SiO 2 or MgO as the sole sintering aid. One possible reason can be due to the raw materials used in this study. The commercial phosphor grade Y 2 O 3 and Nd 2 O 3 powders with large agglomerates were adopted as the starting materials. The specific surface areas for Y 2 O 3 and Nd 2 O 3 powders are only 3.5 g/m 2 and 3.7 g/m 2 , respectively. Therefore, only SiO 2 or MgO used as the sintering aid can not promote the completed densification process. Fig. 3 shows the SEM micrographs of the samples A–C. Grain sizes, grain boundary phase and pores are usually considered as the main factors affecting the transmittance of ceramics [12,13] . As shown in Fig. 3 A1, the average grain size of sample A was about 30 μm. Apparently, no grain-boundary phases existed in the microstructure of ceramics. However, severe abnormal grain growths can be observed, and several pores were trapped into the grain, which can be observed in Fig. 3 A1. The size of the pores was around 2 μm. These trapped pores work as the scattering center and greatly reduce the optical transmittances in the region of short wavelength. Fig. 3 A2 shows the microstructure of the fractured surface of sample A. It could be seen that the fracture mode is transgranular in the large grain area and intergranular in the small grain area. Fig. 3 B1 shows the micrograph of the sample B. It can be seen that the average grain size was about 10 μm. Apparently, no grain-boundary phase or pore can be observed in the microstructure of the sample B. The fracture mode of the sample B was totally transgranular. As shown in Fig. 3 C1, the sample C exhibited the most homogeneous grains and the smallest grain size ∼3 μm, compared with the samples A and B. However, the grains of sample C were not packed densely on each other. Moreover, many pores existed in the triangle grain boundaries, which resulted in the low transmittance of sample C. The microstructure of the fractured surface of the sample C is shown in Fig. 3 C2. The fracture mode was absolutely intergranular. The YAG synthesis from a mixture powders always follows a reaction process which can be decomposed into three successive transformations [14,15] : (1) 2 Y 2 O 3 + Al 2 O 3 → Y 4 Al 2 O 9 ( YAM ) (2) Y 4 Al 2 O 9 + Al 2 O 3 → 4 YAlO 3 ( YAP ) (3) 3 YAlO 3 + Al 2 O 3 → Y 3 Al 5 O 12 ( YAG ) From the TMA thermograms, three successive transformations are revealed by the dilatometric analysis results of the samples. The range of (I) can be correlated to the transformation of YAM → YAP. The second (II) and the (III) correspond to the transformation of YAP → YAG and the densification of YAG, respectively. It can be observed that the transformation temperature does not vary in the sample with the presence of MgO, as shown in Fig. 4 . However, the swelling (YAP → YAG) of the sample with SiO 2 and MgO is much smaller than that of the samples only with SiO 2 or MgO as the sintering aid. It indicates that the compounds of MgO and SiO 2 as the sintering aids can enhance the shrinkage during the transformation of YAP → YAG. Fig. 5 shows the SEM micrographs of sample B sintered at 1300–1780 °C. It can be observed that the residual pores were gradually removed as the sintering temperature increased. According to the data given by TMA, the YAG phase starts to form at 1400 °C. As shown in Fig. 5 , with the increase of the sintering temperature, the grain size of the samples increased slowly below 1600 °C. When the sintered temperature increased from 1600 °C to 1700 °C, the average grain size increased from 1 μm to 4 μm. However, many pores remained between the grain boundaries for the samples sintered at 1700 °C. A full dense and pore-free microstructure was observed at 1780 °C. According to the transmittance of the sample B, the absorption coefficient of Nd:YAG ceramic can be obtained. The absorption spectrum of 1.0 at.% Nd:YAG ceramics from 700 nm to 850 nm is shown in Fig. 6 A. The absorption coefficient of 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG ceramic was 8.64 cm −1 at 808 nm. And the absorption cross section of Nd:YAG ceramic can be calculated to be 6.26 × 10 −20 cm 2 . The emission spectrum of 1.0 at.% Nd:YAG ceramic at room temperature is shown in Fig. 6 B. From 900 nm to 1200 nm, there are two main emission bands centered at 946 nm and 1064 nm, which are corresponding to the transition of 4 F 3/2 → 4 I 9/2 and 4 F 3/2 → 4 I 11/2 of Nd 3+ ions, respectively. And the main emission peak was at 1064 nm, which is same as the emission spectra of the corresponding Nd:YAG single crystals. 4 Conclusions 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG transparent ceramics were fabricated by a reactive sintering method under vacuum using SiO 2 , MgO, and compound additives (SiO 2 and MgO) as the sintering aids. The sample combined with 0.1 wt.% MgO and 0.145 wt.% SiO 2 exhibited the best transparency and the most homogeneous grains among all the samples. The absorption coefficient of 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG ceramics was 8.64 cm −1 at 808 nm. And the absorption cross section of Nd:YAG ceramics was 6.26 × 10 −20 cm 2 . The use of SiO 2 can remove the pores and secondary phases. However, MgO can attribute to the homogeneous grains of ceramics. Obviously, the addition of small amounts of MgO and SiO 2 enhanced the densification rate and also inhibited the abnormal grain growth during the sintering. Acknowledgements The project is sponsored by Nanjing University of Technology PhD thesis innovation fund ( BSCX200902 ), Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions(PAPD), and the natural Science Foundation of China under the Contract Numbers of 60928010 and 50902139. References [1] A. Ikesue Opt. Mater. 19 2002 183 [2] J. Li Y.S. Wu Y.B. Pan W.B. Liu L.P. Huang J.K. Guo Opt. Mater. 31 2008 6 [3] J. Lu M. Prabhu J. Song C. Li J. Xu K. Ueda A.A. Kaminskii H. Yagi T. Yanagitani Appl. Phys. B 71 2000 469 [4] U. Aschauer P. Bowen J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93 2010 814 [5] M. Suarez A. Fernandez J.L. Menendez R. Torrecillas J. Alloys Compd. 493 2010 391 [6] A. Ikesue K. Yoshida T. Yamamoto I. Yamaga J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80 1997 1517 [7] H. Yagi T. Yanagitani T. Numazawa K. Ueda Ceram. Int. 33 2007 711 [8] S. Kochawattana A. Stevenson S.H. Lee M. Ramirez V. Gopalan J. Dumm V.K. Castillo G.J. Quarles G.L. Messing J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28 2008 1527 [9] G. De With H.J.A. Vandijk Mater. Res. Bull. 19 1984 1669 [10] Y.K. Li S.M. Zhou H. Lin X.R. Hou W.J. Li H. Teng T.T. Jia J. Alloys Compd. 502 2010 225 [11] S.H. Lee S. Kochawattana G.L. Messing J.Q. Dumm G. Quarles V. Castillo J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89 2006 1945 [12] A. Ikesue K. Kamata J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79 1996 1927 [13] X.D. Li J.G. Li Z.M. Xiu D. Huo X.D. Sun J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92 2009 241 [14] C. Salle A. Maitre J.F. Baumard Y. Rabinovitch Opt. Rev. 14 2007 169 [15] A. Maitre C. Salle R. Boulesteix J.F. Baumard J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 2008 406

Transmittance improvement of Dy–α-SiAlON in infrared range by post hot-isostatic-pressing

Sintering Behavior, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Various Fluorine-Containing Y-SiAlON Glass-Ceramics

Hot-pressing of Translucent Y-α-SiAlON Ceramics Using Ultrafine Mixed Powders Prepared by Planetary Ball Mill

High Infrared Transmission of Y3+–Yb3+-doped Α-Sialon

A first principles study on optical transparency mechanism in Dy doped ceramics

Carbothermal Reduction Nitridation of Fly Ash, Diatomite and Raw Illite: Formation of Nitride Powders with Different Morphology and Photoluminescence Properties

A First Principles Study on Optical Transparency Mechanism in Dy Doped Α-Sialon Ceramics

Transparent hexagonal Yb:Sr5(PO4)3F ceramics fabricated by hot pressing sintering with LiF doping

Fabrication of highly transparent AlON ceramics by inhibiting decomposition of AlON

The effect of MgO and SiO2 codoping on the properties of Nd:YAG transparent ceramic

Preparation of transparent MgAlON ceramics with tunable compositions

A new and highly active sintering additive: SiO2 for highly-transparent AlON ceramic

Crystallization kinetics, structural and mechanical properties of transparent lithium aluminosilicate glass-ceramics

Fast pressureless sintering of highly transparent AlON ceramics by reducing Y enrichment with nano-sized granular Y 2 O 3 as additive

Optical properties of in situ toughened ScLu–α-SiAlON

A Fast Pressureless Sintering Method for Transparent AlON Ceramics by Using a Bimodal Particle Size Distribution Powder

Influence of LiF on the Infrared Transmissivity of Magnesia Alumina Spinel Transparent Ceramics

Influence of Stabilizing Ions and Sintering Process on the Thermal Conductivity of Α‐sialon Ceramics

Hot isostatic pressing of transparent AlON ceramics assisted by dissolution of gas inclusions

Yb0.5Ca0.75Si7.5Al4.5O1.5N14.5 α-SiAlON ceramics: a hard material with low thermal conductivity

Influence of CaO on microstructure and properties of MgAl2O4 transparent ceramics