The effect of MgO and SiO2 codoping on the properties of Nd:YAG transparent ceramic

Hao Yang,Xianpeng Qin,Jian Zhang,Jan Ma,Dingyuan Tang,Shiwei Wang,Qitu Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2011.05.029

IF: 3.754

2012-01-01

Optical Materials

Abstract:Highlights ► In this study, the effect of MgO and SiO 2 on the optical properties of transparent ceramics was studied. ► High quality Nd:YAG ceramics with compound sintering aids obtained by vacuum sintering at 1780 °C are composed of grains of the size ∼10 μm, and their transmittance is 82% at 400 nm. ► It was found that the absorption coefficient of 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG ceramic is 8.6 cm −1 at 808 nm and its absorption cross section is 6.26 × 10 −20 cm 2 . Abstract Nd:YAG transparent ceramics were fabricated by a reactive sintering method under vacuum using SiO 2 , MgO and compound additives (SiO 2 and MgO) as sintering aids. The effects of SiO 2 and MgO on the microstructure and sintering process of Nd:YAG ceramics were studied. High quality Nd:YAG ceramics with compound sintering aids obtained by vacuum sintering at 1780 °C are composed of grains of the size ∼10 μm, and their transmittance is 82% at 400 nm. It was found the absorption coefficient of 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG ceramic was 8.6 cm −1 at 808 nm and its absorption cross section was calculated to be 6.26 × 10 −20 cm 2 . Keywords Nd:YAG Sintering aids SiO 2 MgO Ceramic 1 Introduction Neodymium doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) has proven to be one of the best solid-state laser materials in previous research due to their excellent physical, mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties [1,2] . Many recent works have shown that the lasing performance of transparent polycrystalline Nd:YAG ceramics is equivalent to or even better than that of Nd:YAG single crystals grown by the Czochralski method [3–5] . It is well known that SiO 2 can be used as the sintering aid to remove the microstructural heterogeneities such as pores and secondary phases to achieve fully dense and transparent Nd:YAG ceramics [6–8] . In addition to SiO 2 , MgO has also been proven as an effective sintering aid for the densification of Nd:YAG transparent ceramics [9] . However, there have been few reports on the effects of co-adding both SiO 2 and MgO as sintering aids in YAG or Nd:YAG transparent ceramics so far [10] . In this study, high quality Nd:YAG transparent ceramics were fabricated by a reactive sintering method under vacuum using both SiO 2 and MgO as the compound sintering aids. The morphologies and microstructure of the fabricated Nd:YAG transparent ceramics were investigated. The effect of MgO and SiO 2 on the optical properties of transparent ceramics was also studied. By using 0.1 wt.% MgO and 0.145 wt.% SiO 2 as the sintering aids, the fully transparent Nd:YAG ceramics with a good transparence are successfully fabricated. It was also found that co-doping MgO and SiO 2 could greatly enhance the densification rate. 2 Experimental procedures High-purity powders of α-Al 2 O 3 (99.99% purity, Shanghai Wusong Chemical Co., Ltd.), Y 2 O 3 (99.999% purity, Jiahua Advanced Material Resources Co., Ltd.) and Nd 2 O 3 (99.995% purity, Jiahua Advanced Material Resources Co., Ltd.) were used as the starting materials, which were all commercially available powders. Three compositions, A (Nd:YAG + SiO 2 ), B (Nd:YAG + SiO 2 + MgO), and C (Nd:YAG + MgO), were designed. The powders were blended together according to the stoichiometric ratio of 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG and were ball-milled with high-purity Al 2 O 3 ball in ethanol for 12 h. The mixtures of the powder were dried and sieved through a 200-mesh screen. After removing the organic components by calcining at 800 °C for 3 h, the powders were pressed into pellets in a stainless steel die at the pressure around 15 MPa. The green body was further followed by cold-isostatically pressed at 200 MPa. The compacted pellets were sintered under vacuum at the vacuum level better than 10 −3 Pa in a furnace equipped with tungsten meshes as the heating elements. After that, the pellets were annealed at 1450 °C for 10 h in air and mirror polished on both surfaces with different grade of the diamond slurries. The phase composition of the specimens was identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Model D5005, Siemens, Germany). The microstructure of the transparent ceramics were checked with the scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6360LV, JEOM, Tokyo, Japan). The optical transmittance of transparent ceramics were measured by a UV–VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (Model Cary-5000, VARIAN, Australia). The kinetics of densification for the Nd:YAG ceramics were examined by a dilatometric equipment (Thermal Mechanical Analyzer, TMA, setsys 16/18, Setaram, France). The emission spectrum of the samples was measured at room temperature by a spectrofluorometer (Fluorolog-3, Jobin Yvon, France), with an 808 nm diode laser as the excitation source. 3 Results and discussion A large number of the previous literatures discussed the phase evolution during sintering [8,11] . Generally, it is hard to get pure YAG phase from the direct reaction of the commercial Y 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 powders during the sintering. The intermediate phases such as Y 4 Al 2 O 9 (YAM) and YAlO 3 (YAP) are commonly found during the reaction. At the temperature higher than 1400 °C, the YAG phase starts to form. In this study, a similar reaction sequence was observed. Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of Nd:YAG transparent ceramics sintered at 1780 °C. All the peaks for the samples A–C can be well indexed to the cubic garnet structure of YAG. This indicated that the full transformation to YAG occurred during the vacuum sintering. The transmittance of Nd:YAG samples with different sintering aids is shown in Fig. 2 . Obviously, the sample B with compounds MgO and SiO 2 as the sintering aids achieved better transmittance than that of the samples A and C only with SiO 2 or MgO as the single sintering aid. The maximum transmittance was 76.9%, 83.8% and 48.2% for the samples A–C at 1064 nm, respectively. It could be seen that the transmittance of sample A decreased sharply with the decrease in the wavelength, especially in the wavelength ranging from 500 to 300 nm. Compared with sample A without MgO as the sintering aid, the transmittance of samples B and C with the presence of MgO decreased less in the region from 1100 to 400 nm. Currently, most of YAG transparent ceramics were fabricated by using SiO 2 as the single sintering aid. However, in this study, high optical quality YAG ceramic was not achieved by only using SiO 2 or MgO as the sole sintering aid. One possible reason can be due to the raw materials used in this study. The commercial phosphor grade Y 2 O 3 and Nd 2 O 3 powders with large agglomerates were adopted as the starting materials. The specific surface areas for Y 2 O 3 and Nd 2 O 3 powders are only 3.5 g/m 2 and 3.7 g/m 2 , respectively. Therefore, only SiO 2 or MgO used as the sintering aid can not promote the completed densification process. Fig. 3 shows the SEM micrographs of the samples A–C. Grain sizes, grain boundary phase and pores are usually considered as the main factors affecting the transmittance of ceramics [12,13] . As shown in Fig. 3 A1, the average grain size of sample A was about 30 μm. Apparently, no grain-boundary phases existed in the microstructure of ceramics. However, severe abnormal grain growths can be observed, and several pores were trapped into the grain, which can be observed in Fig. 3 A1. The size of the pores was around 2 μm. These trapped pores work as the scattering center and greatly reduce the optical transmittances in the region of short wavelength. Fig. 3 A2 shows the microstructure of the fractured surface of sample A. It could be seen that the fracture mode is transgranular in the large grain area and intergranular in the small grain area. Fig. 3 B1 shows the micrograph of the sample B. It can be seen that the average grain size was about 10 μm. Apparently, no grain-boundary phase or pore can be observed in the microstructure of the sample B. The fracture mode of the sample B was totally transgranular. As shown in Fig. 3 C1, the sample C exhibited the most homogeneous grains and the smallest grain size ∼3 μm, compared with the samples A and B. However, the grains of sample C were not packed densely on each other. Moreover, many pores existed in the triangle grain boundaries, which resulted in the low transmittance of sample C. The microstructure of the fractured surface of the sample C is shown in Fig. 3 C2. The fracture mode was absolutely intergranular. The YAG synthesis from a mixture powders always follows a reaction process which can be decomposed into three successive transformations [14,15] : (1) 2 Y 2 O 3 + Al 2 O 3 → Y 4 Al 2 O 9 ( YAM ) (2) Y 4 Al 2 O 9 + Al 2 O 3 → 4 YAlO 3 ( YAP ) (3) 3 YAlO 3 + Al 2 O 3 → Y 3 Al 5 O 12 ( YAG ) From the TMA thermograms, three successive transformations are revealed by the dilatometric analysis results of the samples. The range of (I) can be correlated to the transformation of YAM → YAP. The second (II) and the (III) correspond to the transformation of YAP → YAG and the densification of YAG, respectively. It can be observed that the transformation temperature does not vary in the sample with the presence of MgO, as shown in Fig. 4 . However, the swelling (YAP → YAG) of the sample with SiO 2 and MgO is much smaller than that of the samples only with SiO 2 or MgO as the sintering aid. It indicates that the compounds of MgO and SiO 2 as the sintering aids can enhance the shrinkage during the transformation of YAP → YAG. Fig. 5 shows the SEM micrographs of sample B sintered at 1300–1780 °C. It can be observed that the residual pores were gradually removed as the sintering temperature increased. According to the data given by TMA, the YAG phase starts to form at 1400 °C. As shown in Fig. 5 , with the increase of the sintering temperature, the grain size of the samples increased slowly below 1600 °C. When the sintered temperature increased from 1600 °C to 1700 °C, the average grain size increased from 1 μm to 4 μm. However, many pores remained between the grain boundaries for the samples sintered at 1700 °C. A full dense and pore-free microstructure was observed at 1780 °C. According to the transmittance of the sample B, the absorption coefficient of Nd:YAG ceramic can be obtained. The absorption spectrum of 1.0 at.% Nd:YAG ceramics from 700 nm to 850 nm is shown in Fig. 6 A. The absorption coefficient of 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG ceramic was 8.64 cm −1 at 808 nm. And the absorption cross section of Nd:YAG ceramic can be calculated to be 6.26 × 10 −20 cm 2 . The emission spectrum of 1.0 at.% Nd:YAG ceramic at room temperature is shown in Fig. 6 B. From 900 nm to 1200 nm, there are two main emission bands centered at 946 nm and 1064 nm, which are corresponding to the transition of 4 F 3/2 → 4 I 9/2 and 4 F 3/2 → 4 I 11/2 of Nd 3+ ions, respectively. And the main emission peak was at 1064 nm, which is same as the emission spectra of the corresponding Nd:YAG single crystals. 4 Conclusions 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG transparent ceramics were fabricated by a reactive sintering method under vacuum using SiO 2 , MgO, and compound additives (SiO 2 and MgO) as the sintering aids. The sample combined with 0.1 wt.% MgO and 0.145 wt.% SiO 2 exhibited the best transparency and the most homogeneous grains among all the samples. The absorption coefficient of 1.0 mol% Nd:YAG ceramics was 8.64 cm −1 at 808 nm. And the absorption cross section of Nd:YAG ceramics was 6.26 × 10 −20 cm 2 . The use of SiO 2 can remove the pores and secondary phases. However, MgO can attribute to the homogeneous grains of ceramics. Obviously, the addition of small amounts of MgO and SiO 2 enhanced the densification rate and also inhibited the abnormal grain growth during the sintering. Acknowledgements The project is sponsored by Nanjing University of Technology PhD thesis innovation fund ( BSCX200902 ), Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions(PAPD), and the natural Science Foundation of China under the Contract Numbers of 60928010 and 50902139. References [1] A. Ikesue Opt. Mater. 19 2002 183 [2] J. Li Y.S. Wu Y.B. Pan W.B. Liu L.P. Huang J.K. Guo Opt. Mater. 31 2008 6 [3] J. Lu M. Prabhu J. Song C. Li J. Xu K. Ueda A.A. Kaminskii H. Yagi T. Yanagitani Appl. Phys. B 71 2000 469 [4] U. Aschauer P. Bowen J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93 2010 814 [5] M. Suarez A. Fernandez J.L. Menendez R. Torrecillas J. Alloys Compd. 493 2010 391 [6] A. Ikesue K. Yoshida T. Yamamoto I. Yamaga J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80 1997 1517 [7] H. Yagi T. Yanagitani T. Numazawa K. Ueda Ceram. Int. 33 2007 711 [8] S. Kochawattana A. Stevenson S.H. Lee M. Ramirez V. Gopalan J. Dumm V.K. Castillo G.J. Quarles G.L. Messing J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28 2008 1527 [9] G. De With H.J.A. Vandijk Mater. Res. Bull. 19 1984 1669 [10] Y.K. Li S.M. Zhou H. Lin X.R. Hou W.J. Li H. Teng T.T. Jia J. Alloys Compd. 502 2010 225 [11] S.H. Lee S. Kochawattana G.L. Messing J.Q. Dumm G. Quarles V. Castillo J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89 2006 1945 [12] A. Ikesue K. Kamata J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79 1996 1927 [13] X.D. Li J.G. Li Z.M. Xiu D. Huo X.D. Sun J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92 2009 241 [14] C. Salle A. Maitre J.F. Baumard Y. Rabinovitch Opt. Rev. 14 2007 169 [15] A. Maitre C. Salle R. Boulesteix J.F. Baumard J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 2008 406