Abstract:Airborne particle transport in indoor environments plays an important role in occupant exposure to aerosols and public health problems. Several studies have examined indoor airflow and particle transport using computational fluid dynamics models. For the Lagrangian particle tracking model, the minimum particle concentration necessary for accurate prediction may vary with the airflow regime and sampling volume. Nonetheless, only a few studies have systematically quantified suitable particle numbers and sampling volumes, according to indoor airflow and ventilation conditions. This study addresses this gap by exploring quality control strategies for a Lagrangian particle tracking model to reliably predict indoor particle transport. Based on transient simulations, we analyzed the temporal and spatial distributions of indoor particle trajectories while varying the number of particles, sampling volume, and ventilation strategy. The results indicate that in general a sampling volume of 5 L can predict the normalized mean concentrations better than a 1 L sampling volume, particularly when dealing with a smaller number of particles. Furthermore, the required particle number concentrations vary significantly depending on the chosen ventilation strategy. For instance, under the conditions of a 5 L sampling volume and an air exchange rate of 2.7 h −1 , the minimum particle number concentrations for achieving reliable modeling predictions were observed to be 0.0075 cm −3 for displacement ventilation and 0.015 cm −3 for mixing ventilation. These results highlight the crucial role of the number of simulated particle trajectories in Lagrangian particle tracking models in determining prediction quality. The study findings suggest that quality control measures should acknowledge the significant variability in required particle numbers, which can often differ by an order of magnitude, contingent upon the specific combination of ventilation strategy and sampling volume.

Numerical Prediction of Indoor Airborne Particle Concentration in a Test Chamber with Drift-Flux Model

Test Of A Generalized Drift Flux Model For Simulating Indoor Particle Dispersion

Modeling of Ultrafine Particle Dispersion in Indoor Environments with an Improved Drift Flux Model

Numerical Investigation of the Wall Effect on Airborne Particle Dispersion in A Test Chamber

Transient particle transport prediction based on lattice Boltzmann method-based large eddy simulation and Markov chain model

Numerical Study Of Particle Deposition In Two Differently Ventilated Rooms

Modeling transient particle transport in transient indoor airflow by fast fluid dynamics with the Markov chain method

Particle dispersion and deposition in ventilated rooms: Testing and evaluation of different Eulerian and Lagrangian models

Numerical Investigation of Particle Diffusion in A Clean Room

Predicting contaminant dispersion using modified turbulent Schmidt numbers from different vortex structures

Comparison of three simulation methods of indoor particle dispersion

Comparison of Indoor Aerosol Particle Concentration and Deposition in Different Ventilated Rooms by Numerical Method

Numerical analysis of particle deposition in ventilation duct

Numerical Study of the Effect of Ventilation Pattern on Coarse, Fine, and Very Fine Particulate Matter Removal in Partitioned Indoor Environment

Quality control of Lagrangian indoor particle transport simulation: Effects of particle numbers, ventilation strategy, and sampling volume

Particle Deposition in Indoor Environments: Analysis of Influencing Factors.

Rapid prediction of transient particle transport under periodic ventilation using a non-uniform state Markov chain model

Developing an Empirical Equation for Modeling Particle Deposition Velocity Onto Inclined Surfaces in Indoor Environments

Numerical evaluation of contaminants mixing uniformity in a full-scale test chamber with mixing fan

Mathematical modeling of multi-component aerosol droplet evaporation and growth in indoor environments

CFD Modeling of Aerosol Transport and Deposition Using a Drift-Flux Model