Abstract:Statement of the problem: Manufacturer-recommended exposure durations for light-curing units are often understated and might not have true clinical relevance. Purpose: To compare composite depths of cure among exposure durations provided by the manufacturer and those obtained when optimizing exposure duration for biaxial flexural strength or for composite compule-scraping tests when using different light-curing units. Methods/materials: A hybrid composite (Prodigy, A3, Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) was exposed to different light-curing units (all manufactured by Kerr Demetron) (conventional quartz-tungsten-halogen [QTH], conventional blue light-emitting diode [LED(CONV)] or a high-intensity blue LED light [LED(HIGH)]) for various amounts of time, including that recommended by the manufacturer for the given light. A test model was designed in which 0.5-mm thick composite discs were stacked between Mylar sheets to a total composite thickness of 3.0 mm. The top of each stack was exposed to the different lights for a variety of exposures at a 2-mm distance. Twenty-four hours later, the stacks were disassembled, and the individual discs from each 0.5-mm thick increment were tested for biaxial flexure strength. Ten discs were made for each exposure duration from each light. Statistical analysis (analysis of variance, Dunnett-Hsu post hoc test, alpha = 0.05) was used to identify the exposure duration needed for the flexural strength at a 2.5-mm depth (manufacturer-recommended thickness) to be similar to that at the topmost 0.5-mm thick increment. Compules of the same composite were modified to form cylinders in which their contents were forced to one end and photopolymerized (at a 2-mm distance) for a variety of exposure durations using the same light units mentioned above (N = 5). Twenty-four hours later, compule contents were extruded, and the unpolymerized residue was removed using hand scraping with a plastic spatula. The thickness of the resulting specimen was measured, and was plotted as a function of exposure duration for each light. Regression analysis was applied to generate the mathematical correlation between exposure duration and resulting composite scraped thickness. Manual line-drawing methods were used on that generated plot to determine the major inflection in the exposure-thickness relationship that changed, and the exposure time correlated to that inflection point was considered the optimal exposure duration from this method. Results: Manufacturer-recommended exposures for a 2.5-mm thick composite increment from the lights used were: QTH 20 seconds; LED(CONV) 10 seconds; and LED(HIGH) 5 seconds. Flexural strength and scraped composite compule thickness values markedly changed with increase in exposure duration and differed among the lights. Exposure durations needed to provide similar flexural strength at 2.5 mm as that of the topmost increment were: QTH 30 seconds; LED(CONV) 15 seconds; and LED(HIGH) 20 seconds. Exposure durations derived from inflection points of the scraping plots provided optimal exposure duration values of: QTH 25 seconds; LED(CONV) 15 seconds; and LED(HIGH) 17 seconds. Conclusions: In all cases, use of manufacturer-recommended exposure duration provided a lower flexural strength or scraped composite thickness than did longer exposures used. Exposure durations using the simple scraping method correlated very well with those of the much more sophisticated biaxial test. Clinical significance: No one can provide a clinician with the optimal exposure duration to use for a given light and a specific lot, shade, and brand of composite. Instead, manufacturers offer a single exposure that is meant to be used for all clinical scenarios and operating conditions. The results of this test indicate that manufacturer-recommended exposures proved inadequate to optimize the flexural strength of the recommended increment of composite, but longer exposures were required. The exposure durations determined from the much more simplified composite compule-scrape test proved to match those found to optimize biaxial flexure testing for each light used. Clinicians can thus adapt this very simple in-office scraping test to develop their own customized exposure guide, providing them with exact exposure durations that will optimize composite properties, thus eliminating the guesswork from this most important aspect of chairside dentistry.

The comparison of cure depth and surface hardness of composite resin cured with two kinds of new curing lights and traditional halogen curing light

Comparison of the cure depth of composite resin by three kinds of curing lights

Composite Cure and Pulp-Cell Cytotoxicity Associated with LED Curing Lights.

Polymerization efficacy of composite resin cores with different fluidities under short-time super-intense light exposures

Effect of duration and infection control barriers of light curing unit on hardness of Bulk Fill composite resin

Multi-peak Light-emitting Diode Curing Units and Polymerization of 3D-printed Crown and Bridge Resin

Thermography and conversion of fast-cure composite photocured with quad-wave and laser curing lights compared to a conventional curing light

Effects of Light Attenuation through Dental Tissues on Cure Depth of Composite Resins

Effects of light-curing modes on the polymerization shrinkage and surface hardness of composite resins]

Influence of curing mode on polymerization of dual cured flowable resin composites

Degree of conversion and interfacial adaptation of touch-cure resin cement polymerized by self-curing or dual-curing with reduced light

Impact of Fast High-Intensity versus Conventional Light-Curing Protocol on Selected Properties of Dental Composites

The Effects of Intensity, Exposure Time, and Distance of Polymerization Light on Vickers Microhardness and Temperature Rise of Conventional Resin-Based Composite

Influence of Light-Exposure Methods and Depths of Cavity on the Microhardness of Dual-Cured Core Build-Up Resin Composites

Effect of short LED lamp exposure on wear resistance, residual monomer and degree of conversion for Filtek Z250 and Tetric EvoCeram composites

Comparison of manufacturer-recommended exposure durations with those determined using biaxial flexure strength and scraped composite thickness among a variety of light-curing units

Effects of different LED light curing units on the degree of conversion and microhardness of different composites: FT-IR and SEM-EDX analysis

Effects of Post-Curing Light Intensity on the Mechanical Properties and Three-Dimensional Printing Accuracy of Interim Dental Material

The effect of light curing intensity on bulk-fill composite resins: heat generation and chemomechanical properties

Degree of conversion and contraction stress development of a resin composite irradiated using halogen and LED at two C-factor levels

Effect of cold light bleaching on the surface micro-hardness and surface roughness of resin composites