Abstract:The concept of service government has gradually been universal after the high-tide of the western countries' Reinventing Government Movements since 1980. Under the guidance of service idea, administrative organ and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks determine the forms and types of procedure with discretion in order to accomplish the administrative tasks better. On the one hand, the exercises of procedure discretion make a fuzzy bound between different administrative functions, and also destroy the application premises of the strict principle of legal reservation. In modern administration, intervention administration and supply administration often cooperate with each other perfectly to accomplish the hard administrative tasks flexibly. So it is unadvisable to defend the traditional absolute differentiation between intervention administration and supply administration and to apply the strict principle of legal reservation. On the other hand, the exercises of procedure discretion generate a new phenomenon that several administrative actions achieve one administrative target, which disclose the deficiency of the single administrative action form as the main analytical mean in administrative law. Hence the traditional theory of administrative law, which stereotypes administrative action and then judges its legality according to its constitutive requirements, will obstruct the dynamic administrative process artificially, and will obstruct the court to consider the whole and compound administrative actions comprehensively. To analyze this new type of administrative activity, we should not only abide by the law, but also pay attention to the guidance of the administrative purpose, which requires us to consider the whole administrative process with several administrative actions as dynamic administrative legal relationship, and to explore the compound legal status of administrative organs and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks and administrative counterparts in interactive and pluralistic relationship. The legality of each administrative action should also be judged in dynamic administrative legal relationship.

The Uncertainty of Administrative Adjudication and Its Solution

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

On the Abiding Force of Administrative Action on Civil Adjudication

The Possibility of Reconciliation in Administrative Procedure in Legal Criterion——A Perspective of Legal Interpretation

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Replacing Agency Adjudication with Independent Administrative Courts.

The Analysis Of Administrative Litigation Procedure

Analysis of Impact from Administrative Reconsideration on Administrative Litigation

Rethinking and Reconstruction of the Connection Mechanism between Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Litigation

Procedure Discretion under Service Idea and its Regulation…

The Public Deciding Force of Administrative Action and Impairment of Public Affairs

On the Application of Administrative Doctrine by Judge

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

Research on Judicial Review of Manifestly Improper Administrative Acts

On the induction of juridical modification in the case of Administrative arbitrament for the house backout

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

Judicial Control of Administrative Discretionary Power

Examination of Several Controversial Issues in the Administrative Litigation Law (Draft)