Abstract:The duty to act should be determined by way of combining both the formalized examination based on law and the substantive examination based on substantive legal reasons. In the traditional classification of duties to act, the prior conduct is classified as a formalized duty under law (as the defendant of the omission offense is exact the actor commits the prior conduct) , therefore, so long as the prior conducts are restricted substantially, certain prior conducts can establish the duty to act that entails criminal liability. In China, the requirement of the "equal seriousness" of the omission and the commission by a positive act only means that an omission should also satisfy the constitutive requirements as prescribed by the criminal law. In the context of commission, the killing by a positive act is the cause of the death, and the defendant has control over such cause. Therefore, to establish an omission constitutes murder also requires the defendant has control over the cause of death. In this sense, it is right and acceptable to restrict the substantive requirement of a duty to act to the control over the cause. When the defendant commits a dangerous prior conduct and takes no positive measures to prevent the occurrence of the actual harm, he or she still has control over the cause. Specifically, if a prior conduct creates a source of danger to the legal interest protected by the criminal law, and the danger is so magnified that will be imminently materialized into actual harm without positive measures, the defendant has control over the cause of the actual harm. Omissions, offenses with justificatory defenses, offenses of negligence and intentional offenses may all become the prior conduct which results in the duty to act. Dangerous prior conducts give rise to the duty to act not only for a derivative omission offense, but also for a non-typical genuine omission offense.

Criminal Liability for Dangerous Driving

Reconsideration of Distribution of Liabilities of Crime Committed by an Entity

On the Formal Structure of Unit Crime

Analysis of Relevant Issues on the Crime of Negligently Causing Serious Accident

Also On the Function of Personal Danger in Chinese Criminal Law——Discuss with Researcher You Wei &Judge Lu Jianhong

On Potential Damage for Negligence Offense of Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND VEHICLE OPERATION REGULATIONS

Study on Statutory Penalty Allocation for Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime

Analysis of Crime of Endangering Public Security by Dangerous Means

Study on Offence Form of Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime

The Analysis on Way of the Criminal Regulations to the Drunken Driving

On the Stipulation"Avoidance of Responsibility Leading to Death" in Traffic Offence

On "Death Caused by Escape" in Crimes of Causing Traffic Casualties

Prior Conduct of Omission Offenses

Strictly Restrict the Scope and the Punishments of Aggregated Consequential Offences

On Harmful Behavior in Purely Intoxicated State

The Study of the Subject of Automobile Liability

The Principle of Culpability and Foreseeablity in Negligent Crime

The Studies of Negligent Crime

A Research on Administrative Violating Aggravation