Curing performance of three different curing lights at different distances for a resin composite

Hao Xinqing,Luo Meng,Leng Xin,Zhu Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-7565.2011.02.003

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the performance of three curing lights with high power density at different distances in terms of the surface microhardness of a resin composite.Methods Three types of lights were used to cure 90 cylindrical light-cured resin composite specimens for curing 40 seconds.The distances between curing tip and the surface of specimens were 0mm,3mm,6mm,9mm,12mm,15mm respectively.After photocuring,the specimens were stored in the distilled water in a light proof container at 37°C for 24 hours.The top and bottom of the specimen's KHNs were determined.Data were analyzed by statistics software,the valid hardness percent values were messured.The power densities on the surface of the specimen at different curing distances were determined,then the linear regression analysis was performed using logarithm of the power density and the distance from the light curing tips to the radiometer sensor.Results There was a linear relationship between the logarithm of the power density and the curing distance.Curing light and the curing distance influence the hardness significantly.The specimens' KHNs cured with the Mini LED AutoFocus light were higher than those photoactivated with the LEDemetron I light and Optilux 401 light.There was no statistically significant difference in KHNs between the LEDemetron I group and the Optilux 401 group.Along with the distance increased,the KHNs were decreased significantly.Most of the experimental groups could obtain the valid hardness percent values.Conclusions The tiny changes of the distances between curing light and the surface of resin would influence the power density significantly.So only using the curing light with higher power density can provide sufficient curing of the composite at a clinically long distance.