Abstract:The Administrative Litigation Law of China 1989 paints a rosy picture in which the individual and the government face each other in court, both submitting to the judgment of the law. However, in reality, many administrative cases do not conclude with judicial rulings but largely with withdrawals by plaintiffs (varying between 30-57%). In recent years, coordination and settlement in administrative litigations are even advocated in the official directives.This paper employs national statistical data, articles and reports written by judges to demonstrate that in most situations, withdrawals in administrative cases have not only denied individual plaintiffs the opportunity to protect their legal rights through litigation, but also rendered illusory any potential contribution that litigations might have towards the rule of law. The large number of withdrawals indicates the degree of difficulty that the institution of administrative litigation faces. Efforts made by the Supreme People's Court to enhance the number of administrative cases or reduce the rate of withdrawal have failed to reverse the general pattern. The preference for coordination and settlement that courts at all levels have expressed in administrative litigation may be partly motivated by the prevailing judicial philosophy, but it is believed to be primarily a collective compromise that courts have made in face of challenging conditions.The paper indicates that the institution of administrative litigation, embedded in the contemporary political and social structure of China, cannot be a means for achieving constitutional governance in China, and its impact on social change is severely limited. To eliminate the obstacles to administrative litigation, the immediate priority should be the promotion of judicial independence and authority. In the long term, the reform depends on the growth of civil society and the perfection of democratic politics.

On the Function of China's Administrative Litigation

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

On Jurisprudence Leading to Judicial Path——the Realism Path of China's Jurisprudence

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Litigations Without a Ruling: the Predicament of Administrative Law in China

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

"Typical Cases" As an Informal Legal Source in the Administrative Law

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

A Study on the Administrative Public Interest Litigation System

On the Abiding Force of Administrative Action on Civil Adjudication

The Analysis Of Administrative Litigation Procedure

Examination of Several Controversial Issues in the Administrative Litigation Law (Draft)

Retrospection of the Development of China'Administrative Rule of Law--Experience and Lesson

Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity

How the Courts Develop Administrative Law

On the Organ Litigation --Thinking of perfecting the legislation of the administrative organic law

The Jurisprudential Problems in the Early Stage of Chinese Litigation