Abstract:For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs. By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts. This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

Retrospection of the Development of China'Administrative Rule of Law--Experience and Lesson

On Jurisprudence Leading to Judicial Path——the Realism Path of China's Jurisprudence

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

The Rule of Law in China and the Modernization of Higher Education Governance

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

Improving the System of Legal Textbooks

Assessment of the Rule of Law and Its Application in China

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

Logic Foundation and Practical Text of Administration by Law

Forty Themes on the Innovation and Development of Chinese Legal Research in the Reform and Opening Up Era

Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity

Thirty Years' Rule of Environmental Law in China: Retrospect and Reassessment

CHINESE EXPERIENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM

Not Self-evident "Chinese Legal Ideal-Picture"

The Basic Issues concerning the Construction of the Rule of Law in China in the New Era

Glancing back Theoretical Foundation of Administrative Law : Evolution Of a Holism

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

How the Courts Develop Administrative Law

Litigations Without a Ruling: the Predicament of Administrative Law in China