Abstract:For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs. By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts. This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

CHINESE EXPERIENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM

Marketization, globalization and administrative reform in China: a zigzag road to a promising future

CONTINUITY VERSUS CHANGE: EVOLVING TRAJECTORIES OF CHINESE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Domestic Reform and Global Integration: Public Administration Reform in China over the Last 30 Years

China's Administration and Civil Service Reform: An Introduction

China’s Administration and Civil Service Reform

Balancing Local Concerns and Global Views: Western Administrative Theory in China’s Reform Practices

Retrospection of the Development of China'Administrative Rule of Law--Experience and Lesson

Deepening Administrative Reforms:Three Key Issues

Administrative Monitoring in China

The 1998 Administrative Reform in China: Issues, Challenges and Prospects

What Government Shall Do?:A Reflection on Chinaese Administrative Reform

Réforme Nationale Et Intégration Mondiale : La Réforme De L'administration Publique En Chine Ces Trente Dernières Années

Education Reform: Experience from China

Marching Through the Deep-Water Zone: Chinese Public Sector Reforms and the Way Forwards

CHINA’ S ADMINISTRATIVE REGION DIVISION REFORMA ND MECHANISM

An Analysis of Administrative System Reform in China from the View of Progressive Decision-making Theory

The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

Study on the reform dilemma and reform path of administrative examination and approval bureau

China’s Public Service System:Developments of Social Policy, Institution and Mechanism