A generalized closed‐form analytic design technique for solid‐state Marx generators
Mahmoud S. Hassan,Ibrahim M. Safwat,Ahmed M. E. Abounemra,Hesham N. Ahmed
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.3961
IF: 2.378
2024-02-02
International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications
Abstract:In this article, the circuit parameters (stage capacitance, duty cycle, and voltage droop) of a generic resistive‐loaded solid‐state Marx generator (SSMG) that produces a single/burst of pulses are precisely modeled. A closed‐form analytic design algorithm is proposed to provide an in‐depth vision of the individual effect of the SSMG's design parameters on the circuit performance. Summary Solid‐state Marx generators (SSMGs) are capable of generating high‐voltage pulses, with certain repetition frequency, and have a multitude of applications. Published research work targets more elaborate SSMG circuits without the existence of a specific design procedure. In this paper, basic circuit parameters (stage capacitance, duty cycle and voltage droop) of generic resistive‐loaded SSMG—producing a single/burst of pulses—are precisely modeled. Accordingly, a generalized, closed‐form analytic design algorithm suitable for any resistive‐loaded SSMG is presented; the proposed algorithm guides designers throughout the SSMG design phase and furthermore, produces parametric design curves that provide designers with an in‐depth vision of the individual effect of each design parameter on the circuit performance. To quantify the robustness of the proposed algorithm, it is used to design a simple conventional, load‐dependent SSMG architecture fulfilling specific application requirements (frequency of 10 KHz, peak output voltage of 1.2 KV, and 510‐W average power per burst). Based on the obtained design and using the derived equations, the average power per burst is calculated for different number of pulses in the range of 1–10 pulses for the simulation and the implementation. The resulting relative error between the simulation and the measurement results is found to be in the range of 0.14%–0.37%. Afterward, the proposed algorithm is used to validate the published results of a complex SSMG. The relative error between the published results and those obtained using the proposed algorithm does not exceed 2.5%; this validates the modeling behind the proposed design technique and renders it as a solution approach for any resistive‐loaded SSMG topology irrespective of its complexity.
engineering, electrical & electronic