Abstract:Judges and parties play the different roles in clarifying facts of cases;thereby the civil procedures can basically be classified to three models worldwide: the Dialog Procedure in Germany,the Adversary System in the USA and the Cooperative Adversary Process in Japan.Comparatively,in the German civil justice system,which encourages the dialog between judges and parties and follows the principle of party presentation,judges play an active role and take the responsibility of materielleProzessleitungspflicht in the civil proceedings,which greatly contributes to the concentration of the trial procedure and represents the trend of the modern civil procedure development.The judges in China play an active role historically,but now this "active" role has to be adapted from the inquiry system to the party-presentation system.So we are facing the following questions: What role should Chinese judges play during the clarifying of the facts in issues? Should the cooperation duty,the duty of truth,the duty to accelerate the process and etc.be applied in China? The answers will be also important to improve the confession,the evidence-presenting limits and the abuse of litigation.Only with the help of the procedural duty system it can be guaranteed that every action will be determined justly,speedily and intensively.

From Doctrine of Ex officio to Doctrine of Adversary Hearing

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

A Study on Adversarial Litigation

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

From Adversary System to Cooperative System

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

The Adversary Procedure Model and Judicial Duty Model of Civil Proceedings

Why Adjudication must be Adversary?

On the Judge's Role in the Usage of Evidence under the Model of Adversary Trial

On the Transition of the Modes of Pretrial Procedure of Civil Litigation

On Basic Principles of Civil Adversarial Procedure

Review on the Inefficiency and Disorganization of Judicial Power

Dislocation and Rectification: Reflection on System of Adjudicatory Supervision

Reflections on Issues Concerning the Basic Principles of the Civil Procedural Law

Constructivism of Civil Procedure with Argumentation on Proceedings and Trials: And Advice on Revision and Promotion of Civil Procedural Law

Frontiers of the Civil Procedural Law Theory

The Adversarialness and the Cooperation in Judicial Process

Views on Conducting Civil Proceedings by Procuratorial Institutions

On the Construction of the Pretrial Procedure with the Nature of Self- sufficiency in the Civil Procedure of China--The Idea of Reform:Coexistence of Pretrial Procedure and Court Trial Procedure

Jurisprudential Thinking on the Perfection of Civil Procuratorial Power

Civil Procedural Duties System in the Modern Society: A Research on the Different Roles of Judges and Parties in Clarifying Facts of Cases