Abstract:In common law jurisdictions, the notion of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is frequently related to notions such as the belief or certainty of a judge or a juror about reality. The notion of balance of probabilities is however related to likelihood or probability. In the present study, we link belief and proof by introducing the notion of epistemic modality, which is concerned with the speaker's belief in propositional probability. The variation in the orientation of epistemic modality helps to integrate the two levels of proof and bridge the apparent test gap between them. The notion of relevance is further introduced in order to clarify the nature of legal proof by taking rape cases as example. This study also provides an integrated model to improve but diversify the expressions in terms of the burden of proof. For most courts, court judgments are processed only according to the general case data, procedural context; such kinds of fact-based information processing and information retrieval seldom help the court to make its decision unless with tremendous and repetitious work. For the consistency and efficiency of court adjudication, it is suggested in the present study that a Knowledge Management (KM) model mainly based on elements and factors which decide or affect the criminal liability. Such a KM model provides an overall framework, though non-exhaustive, and therefore makes court adjudication within narrow discretion and achieves the maximum justice.

On the Judge's Role in the Usage of Evidence under the Model of Adversary Trial

Mode of the Judge Thinking

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

Why Adjudication must be Adversary?

A Study on Adversarial Litigation

On the Influence of the New Provisions of Evidence on Civil Lawsiut System

The Rules of Evidence in Procedural Adjudication

On the Trial Mode Centralized on Files and Notes

From Doctrine of Ex officio to Doctrine of Adversary Hearing

Judgement on Evidence Attribute ——enlightenment on Comparative Law and Law Methodology

The Adversary Procedure Model and Judicial Duty Model of Civil Proceedings

Comparison Between the of Expert Witness Model and the Judicial Identification (Expert Testimony) Model

Gauging Court Adjudication: Qualification And Quantification

On the Theories of Examination,Admissibility and Evaluation of Evidence

Issues on the Evaluation of Evidence

Return to Reality: The True Essence of Civil Procedure Law-Critique on the Lawsuit Evidence Formulated by the Supreme People's Court

Analsis of the Direction of Evidentiary System Reform in China from Historical Transformation of Judicial Proving Module

The Adversarialness and the Cooperation in Judicial Process

Civil Procedural Duties System in the Modern Society: A Research on the Different Roles of Judges and Parties in Clarifying Facts of Cases

On the Effect of Judged Facts

Thinking about the Making Corrections Function of the Trial of Appeal——From the rank relationship of court